tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6337568240689378702.post8641136233932412041..comments2023-11-17T02:23:26.098-06:00Comments on A Penigma - a mystery, under a pseudonym: Why does this man still have a cc permit?Penigmahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05134413210507419937noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6337568240689378702.post-10313648677945907032014-05-15T08:08:30.294-05:002014-05-15T08:08:30.294-05:00I'm familiar with the GCA '68, and with su...I'm familiar with the GCA '68, and with subsequent amendments to it. You improperly differentiate possession from ownership, btw. <br />IF YOU knew your law better, you would know that it was written in such a way that it is rarely if ever enforced, which is why other and better legislation has been necessary. Perhaps you should read the NYT article on gun rights routinely trumping the dog gonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00151618317070878675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6337568240689378702.post-750778052084756412014-05-15T06:26:50.304-05:002014-05-15T06:26:50.304-05:00"It's time for a new rule" Or you c..."It's time for a new rule" Or you could better know the rules. GCA '68 Makes any person who is the subject of a protective order a prohibited person from owning a firearm. Since protective orders rightly sidestep due process, this status is removed once the protective orders expire. You will note that in every story police searched his home, and did not turn up any Weer'd Beardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13528978001340070552noreply@blogger.com