What the supporters of "gun rights" fail to comprehend, despite their saying guns are "inanimate objects" is that "inanimate objects" can be turned against them.
It's also poor policy to allow your opponents to be well armed.
Unfortunately, the concept of "gun rights" has allowed for the US to have way too many guns in the hands of the wrong people.
London Broadcasting Corporation's James O'Brien asks, 'Why are Charlie Kirk's words suddenly off limits?' Especially since Kirk did say about gun deaths on April 5, 2023, "I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."
The best sentence I've read on this subject is: "I don't support what happened to Charlie Kirk, but he did."
How can you condemn me if Kirk said, "I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."
If it's wrong to quote Charlie Kirk's words then it probably was wrong for Charlie Kirk to make those comments in the first place.
Anyway, here's Tim Black for a final comment:
No comments:
Post a Comment