Friday, March 28, 2025

That's not a laptop in this briefcase--More Mangione

Part of me would think that the powers that be would want to see firearms more strictly regulated after this event.

On the other hand, the MP5, in particular the SP5 or any other variant without a stock, is considered a pistol (as in MachinePistol 5). That means one can carry it concealed! 

And what better way to do that than in a briefcase, which is perfect for CEO personal protection!

From HKParts
There are also holster/harnesses for the 5K. M&L Custom Shop makes them.

Both of these are designed for the professional where concealment and quick deployment of weapon is essential.  So, this isn't going to be something a CEO will be carrying, but the well cared for CEO should have a protection detail in the current political climate.

Of course, if the average civvy wants to tote around an MP5K/SP5K, then there are a few options out there. A few companies make discrete subgun cases which can pass for a laptop/brief case. Not as quck to use as the H&K briefcase, but definitely a way to carry the gun and not get a lot of attention.

Although, I am not sure I would want to carry one of the briefcases around without a fair amount of range time with it. Toss in that it isn't as convenient as it appears at first.

Still, the thought that CEO personal protection can take out a threat is worth considering.

Thompson could have used a PA like leaspeed6 that morning!

Thursday, March 27, 2025

How Sweden turns its trash into gold

I would have thought that other countries would have followed Sweden's example from back in the 1970s. But, no.


The United States government is far too under the thumb of big business to do this, which is rather bizarre. I say that because being truly "green", instead of "greenwashing" is actually a great business strategy. Not only is it good for the environment, but it is also good for the bottom line.

Toss in things like recycling electronics is something which business is SUPPOSED to do, but it doesn't.

Maybe they think all the heavy metals out there in the environment making people dumber is a good thing.

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Don't get your hopes up about Luigi Mangione's defence.

Funny, but this comment has gotten lost in the shuffle. On the other hand, it doesn't look too good for KFA to be expending all this energy on a client with "overwhelming evidence" against him. She would be working on mitigations if she was a barrister in the UK. Septics are a little more liberal in allowing BS in the court system.

 Karen Friedman Agnifilo, may have been providing some insight into her legal strategy when she said, "the evidence is going to be so overwhelming" that an insanity defense is on the table.

 So, of course, she's going to be filing every motion imaginable and hoping not to piss off the court. Some Judges don't take kindly to attorneys who waste the court's time on defendants the attorney KNOWS happens to be guilty.

But, why should KFA give a rat's ass?  She's got the go fund me cash and it's her's even if Mangione does plead out to get the needle.

Think I'm BS'ing you? This clip has it straight from the horse's mouth. Start at around 45 seconds in for an eye opener.


And I agree with much of what everybody is saying. But I think one thing I just want to point out is it looks to me like this -- there might be a not guilty by reason of insanity defense that they're going to be thinking about, because the evidence is going to be so overwhelming that he did what he did.
Karen Agnifilo Friedman, Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, Aired December 10, 2024 - 20:00   ET  https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/acd/date/2024-12-10/segment/01

Cut the BS--Mangione is going to trial with all the evidence being legally obtained.

 OK, My legal qualifications are: JD from the University of Maryland, LLM University of Exeter, England. Admitted to the PA bar in 1990, retired in 2023. Admitted to the DC bar,  EDPA (Fed), and MDPA (Fed). That said, I can give a legal opinion.

The picture is of the Blair County, Police Criminal Complaint, which can be found here:
https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20241209/233900-mangione12924.pdf

According to this document, the police were responding to a report of a male who resembled the person wanted for the shooting of Brian Thompson. 

 Mangione removed the mask and the police said they recognised him from the media. Then Mangione gave the police the fake ID used at the NYC hostel. Any searches according to this would be incident to arrest or an inventory search.

You get what the police will probably say in the clip of the press conference which starts at 10:50.

Unless the defence can come up with something substantial, Mangione's arrest appears to be legal based upon what I see here.


 More court documents can be found here:
https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/criminal-justice/luigi-mangione-court-documents-gun-charge-ME4VXEHIOFBK7FIO5STIXXWAPQ/

Friday, March 21, 2025

MAGA? This Railroad Could Cripple America's Economy

"The upgrades now rolling across this route will do a whole lot more than safeguard millions of journeys and a huge slice of the US economy. They could enable America to finally run truly high speed trains. An ambition which has harboured since forever."


You may be someone who doesn't understand how much railraods contribute to a country's economy: even the US. The US has neglected this segment of the tranportation sector to its detriment. But it's also been neglecting an even worse segment of the transportation infrastructure: the one that services the automobile (which includes trucking).

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Was Luigi Mangione's DNA collected illegally?

Rosalind Franklin By MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
 OK, this is called touch or trace DNA since it is found on an object. It doesn't need to be something that the cops gave him, since someone leaves this DNA pretty much everywhere. Yes, the Fourth Amendment analogue in Pennsylvania law has a broader guarantee of the right of privacy, but how intrusive was this would be my question? The police could just as well  get this DNA from the food he was eating at McDonald's as well as from something they gave him.

His defence could question the science, but that requires Mangione providing a sample of his DNA. Also, PA law says:

§ 58.2 . Authority of law enforcement officers.
The General Assembly has declared that nothing contained in the act shall limit or abrogate any existing authority of law enforcement officers to take, maintain, store and utilize DNA samples for law enforcement purposes. See section 506 of the act (35 P. S. § 7651.506). Failure to comply with this subchapter does not
form the basis for suppression of otherwise admissible evidence.

And Pennsylvania's law on DNA evidence (CHAPTER 58. DNA DETECTION OF SEXUAL AND VIOLENT OFFENDERS ACT) specifically mentions 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502 (relating to murder) as a reason for collecting DNA.

It sounds to me like this may be an attempt to diminish the size of the mountain of evidence which incriminates Mangione.

I mean, he was caught with the ID used to stay at the NYC hostel, the murder weapon, and his DNA links him to the crime scene. Of course, the defence wants to see this evidence suppressed. 

My opinion is that it will be allowed unless the defence can discredit the science, which would probably require Mangione to submit a DNA sample.

Italian High Speed Rail: The Trains that Killed an Airline

I finally made it to Italy, despite having spent a lot of time in the French Alps, which happen to be literally next door. In fact, we were staying in Chamonix and went to Courmayeur, that happens to be in the Vallée d'Aoste someplace I've been wanting to visit for a long time.

Anyway, I was rather surprised that Italy is a leader in High Speed Trains. These two videos give you some ideas why I support HSR. 

So much for Making America Great Again if Italy is kicking the US's but in this regard. These trains leave Acela in the dirt.


 

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Luigi Mangione's defence fund.

I was listening to an interview with one of the people from his "defence fund". She said that they wanted him to have the best defence possible,

That got me thinking because his best defence right now is to hope for a really good deal from the prosecution. Which isn't a very likely possibility from the Feds.

For those who don't know it, the feds have a 93% conviction rating. Mostly because they don't try cases they can lose. Federal practise can best be described as "Let's make a deal". In other words, you had better have something juicy you can offer the AUSA handling the case. They might knock down the charges so that Mangione gets life (which is indeed life since there is no time off for good behvaiour in the Federal system).

We used to get people to become cooperative when I worked for the US Attorney in DC by threatening to make the charges federal, since that would mean a "solid" sentence anywhere in the US Prison system.

But that's an aside since I was thinking that maybe some of those big, anonymous donors were health care companies who want to see Mangione have the best defence possible, since he is probably going to go down hard.

And the reality is that he's not as good of a defendant as people want him to be. As I have pointed out, even his mother thinks he could have done it!

To be honest if all of his supporters would shut the fuck up and work on this issue, I'm pretty sure that there would be change. But what have they done about this?  Have they supported serious health care reform?

Obviously not.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

What don't you understand about "domestic violence"?

In the previous post, "Misinterpreting the Constitution", I mention the phrase "domestic violence", which has a drastically different meaning today from what the founders understood it to mean. While this video is fairly elementary (as in it's like my A level english course), it does make a few important points about language.
 

The major takeaway is that language of even a fairly recent time might be different from how we interpret it. And it's definitely different from what it was 240 some years ago. It's wrong to impose modern ideas on a text that old: especially if it is detrimental to modern society.

This next video gets into how when Shakespeare (Shakespear?) is heard in the original pronounciation, it makes the meaning clearer. Likewise, when the constitution is understood as a whole, it makes the meaning of the Second Amendment much more obvious that it relates to the militia, which is an institution that has changed drastically from how it was original conceived by the founders.

Another takeaway is that what people think pirates should talk like is the West Country Accent. I have to wonder if Shakepeare's English is coloured by his being from Warwickshire, which isn't exactly West Country, but it would have been signifiantly far away from London when he was alive. After all, the World's End Pub in Chelsea WAS way outside of London when it was built. Even where I live now wasn't as built up as it is now in the mid-1700s!

And people who have seen "Lost in Austen" will remember her visit to Regency period Hammersmith. I used to live in an area that was once farmland in the mid-18th Century and is now considered centre city.  But that's a lot of a digression other than life has changed quite a bit from the late 18th Century and we can't place modern ideas on texts written over 200 years ago. That probably even applies to something written 25 years ago.

Anyway, see also:


Thursday, March 13, 2025

Misinterpreting the constitution.

 What would you say if I told you that there is a constitutional obligation of the States to address the topic of domestic violence?

It's in the Constitution at Article 4, Section 4:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Of course, domestic violence in the constitutional sense isn't a battered spouse. Instead the founders knew that danger might arise from internal forces, It is the constitutional obligation of the people in the federal government to use whatever power is necessary to deal effectively with both threats. So, it is the federal government to “protect” the people from “domestic violence” as well as from “invasion.”

Yet another tenet of the gun rights crowd shot down since the constitution is pretty clear that it deals with matters of the common defence and insure domestic tranquility. Can't have armed bands running around threatening the constitutional framework. After all, Shays' Rebellion was one of the reasons for the adoption of the Constitution. 

The war for independence was a pyrrhic victory in that it left the "United States" in disarray and heavily in debt.  The founders could have just said, "fuck it, we made a mistake, let's not bother with starting a new nation."  Each state would go its own way.

But the mythology is that it was the colonists themselves threw out the British at Lexington, Concord, and Bunker Hill. Nevermind that the War for Independence went on for eight more years with a lot of help from foreign powers, particularly the French. And with that myth came the belief in "god, guns, and guts" made the US great.

But the War for Independence wasn't really the start of the colonists' aspirations, the glorification of the War for Independence leaves out that it was a reaction to receiving the bill for the French and Indian War. A war that led to British Troops being stationed in the colonies. It was their presence which led to these complaints in the Declaration of Independence:

  • He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
  • He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

The founders understood the right guaranteed by the Second Amendment as relating to the Militia and the Common Defence, in particular the powers given to Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 16. I would refer you to the analog to the Second Amendment created by Thomas Jefferson in the Virginia Constitution of 1775.

What got me to write this was someone did a youtube video about American's love for guns which totally misstated the facts and presented the mythology of guns in the United States. We wouldn't be in the mess we are if it hadn't been for a radical reinterpretation of the US Constitution, in particular the Second Amendment, for a fantasy version of that text.

So, if you want to ask me "what don't I understand about 'Shall not be infringed'"? I have to ask if you believe that acts of domestic violence should be addressed by the state government?

The ultimate answer is that asking what I don't understand about "shall not be infringed" removes the Second Amendment from its historic and consitutional context. One which needs to be read as a whole since Marbury v Madison said that such an interpretation is "form without substance" it makes the section is mere surplusage -- is entirely without meaning -- if such is to be the construction since It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect, and therefore such construction is inadmissible unless the words require it.

see also:

 

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Yet another US gun ownership myth being blown apart.


 This is a clip from "Warriors of the Dawn: Indigenous Weapons and Tactics of King Philip's War" by Atun-Shei films (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMXKXoA1_gQ ).

People talk about the Pilgrims, but they neglect Jamestown's Starving time. This occurred during the winter of 1609-1610, when two-thirds of the Jamestown colonists died of starvation, disease, and Indian attacks. Any firearms they had weren't very helpful.

As this native American interpreter points out, as I have as well, firearms during this period were expensive. They aren't inexpensive now either with the low end being around $200 for a new handgun. Maybe one can buy a beat up, used one for less than that.  AR-15s start arround $450 and go up,  with something like an H&K 556 at around 3k or Knight's Armament KS-1s being around 5k.

But a modern firearm is machine made, whereas firearms in prior to the 19th century were pretty much handmade. So, think about buying something like a Purdey, Holland and Holland, and Westley Richards did make firearms for the British Military. Maybe that's why they have a thing for overpriced guns for the army.

 The US war for independence bankrupted the country. Toss in the colonists would probably have lost if they didn't get help from France, or use stolen British arms.

Monday, March 10, 2025

CRYPTO CRASH: THE REAL REASON FTX COLLAPSED

OK, I've been saying that cryptocurrencies are a bad investment and generally not a good idea. But this is really interesting since he's saying that the Chinese have cornered the crypto market, caused a "run on the bank", and don't allow for cryptocurrencies in their country.

To quote Mr. Spock: "Interesting."

Wanna buy some tulips? How about an NFT of the Brooklyn Bridge?

Why proper regulation of firearms in the US is going to be difficult

It's not that I don't support gun regulation, but it's going to be really hard given the amount of guns in the US.

 

Getting them off the streets is going to require following Australia's example of having a massive gun buyback. But imagine how much that will cost. Toss in the Aussies funded their buyback with a tax.

it also seems there are a lot of these going on as is, but there are a lot of guns out there.

Why Luigi Mangione Says His "Manifesto" Should Be Tossed.

This is the best explanation I have seen on this subject. Too many people on the internet are ignoring the law.

Sunday, March 9, 2025

Luigi Mangione and the real elephant in the room

OK, while I support gun regulation: I am on the outs with a lot of the groups who are "working" on this effort. This is due to their support for duopoly candidates, who caused the problem. But it has gotten even worse with this incident.

Legislators who denounce "ghost guns" use this as a springboard for a "discussion on healthcare". I would hope that the reaction would have been different had Mangione been a mass shooter, but I am not so sure. His admiration for the Unabomber and use of assassination seems to be passed over.

If anything, this incident is a side show to distract from the real issues out there. In this case, his use of a ghost gun, which is a definite issue in the "gun violence" sector.

According to the Department of Justice, the number of ghost guns recovered by law enforcement skyrocketed from 1,758 in 2016 to 19,344 in 2021, a surge of more than 1,000%. Nearly 700 of those weapons were involved in suspected homicides or attempted homicides.
OK, other than the gun rights crowd, not too many people are paying attention to this.

So, while I know the Second Amendment has been misinterpreted, I doubt that the US will ever be able to address its gun violence problem. (BTW, anyone for using "domestic violence", US Constitution Article 4, Section 4, for some fun?)

I would also add that the US's tendency toward violence is actually quite frightening.

Saturday, March 8, 2025

Searching Mangione with suspicion makes it constitutional.

 I'm with Jim Giza who is a former marine and a 23-year police veteran with the Baltimore Police Department. He was one of the first officers to qualify as a both a member of his Agency’s SWAT unit and Hostage Negotiation Team. He later served as Program Coordinator for the Johns Hopkins University Police Executive Leadership Program, where he planned and coordinated a unique educational program for the United States Secret Service.

I hope that the stop-and-frisk of Luigi Magione, which apparently is what it was, meets the U.S. Supreme Court’s criteria of reasonable suspicion and articulable justification for confronting an American citizen, searching same for possible weapons, and arresting that individual for illegally carrying a firearm (“Luigi Mangione faces tough legal challenges, says Baltimore lawyer with ties to family,” Dec. 11). In Magione’s case, he was charged not only with illegal carrying but also possession of an illegal gun — what is known as a “ghost gun.”

I also hope the police report documenting the stop-and-frisk is based on more than a tip or that it “looks like him.” It will be up to a judge to entertain a possible argument by a defense lawyer that Magione’s arrest was illegal by not meeting the stop-and-frisk criteria promulgated in Terry v. Ohio. If not, any so-called evidence seized or charges filed will be null and void.

Whether a challenge to the arrest will be made, time will tell. The extradition question may not be even be the offing. It goes without saying (but I will say it anyway) that it is tough being a cop in a free society and high-profile cases like this one can prove it.

As I said in a previous post, police officers are given latitude to search a suspect for weapons, which they found in this case.

The only reason the defence wants to try and challenge this is that Mangione was caught with the murder weapon, a substantial amount of cash, and his "manifesto", which is basically a confession. Not that there isn't other evidence tying Mangione to the crime scene, but this significantly hinders the case,

Luigi Mangione "the biggest staged perp walk"?

I kinda had to wonder if his lawyer ever heard about a guy called Jack Ruby when she made that comment. I mean she's supposedly a really well qualified criminal defence lawyer.

Anyway,  I wake up to this headline:

EXCLUSIVE:  Diddy and Luigi Mangione are TARGETS after brutal stabbing at Brooklyn prison as insiders claim gangs plan to 'make an example of them'

Seriously, any criminal defence lawyer worth their money SHOULD know that a high profile client like Mangione will be a target: despite the adulation he's getting from the masses. I was wondering how long it would take before this became an issue.

The prison consultant went on to say that from his experience, high-profile inmates are advised to be "careful about who they are associating with" because anyone in MDC will have an "agenda". He added that Diddy's and Luigi's teams would warn them to keep to themselves and avoid problems, such as minding their business and not taking any bait if called out.

"Some will admire them [Diddy and Luigi], but you will just need one person to make an example out of them." Justin stated.


Well, I hope she's gotten her hands on all that money the little scumbag has raised, then she can laugh all the way to the bank if the law of Karma rules here.

Hey, what kind of trial did Brian Thompson get when Mangione popped him?

Friday, March 7, 2025

The REAL ISSUES in the Luigi Mangione Case as I see it.

 OK, despite the amount of people who want to deny the mountain of evidence that this kid did it, the media is pretending he has a chance of being found not guilty. But I'm going to agree with another lawyer who said he's seen juries do crazy things.

Anyway...

He was caught with more than enough evidence that links him to the crime, which is why his lawyers keep harping on his arrest and search being unconstitutional.  He had the murder weapon, the ID used in NYC, and his manifesto, which is pretty much a confession. I'm not going to go into the law of confessions, but it would be nice if all these talking heads would start mentioning that.

Mistrials and Jury nullification. OK, a mistrial doesn't result in an acquittal--it does result in a new trial. Also, as long as there is one juror who is willing to find the defendant guilty, there will be a hung jury. So, 11 jurors can ignore the law and evidence, while one wants to convict. And a hung jury results in a new trial.

Of course, the judge and prosecution should be weeding out the people who would engage in jury nullification. While not toally illegal, it is contrary to the judicial process where the juror is supposed to apply the law according to the facts. Here is a sample jury instruction that addresses that matter:

6.1 Duties of Jury to Find Facts and Follow Law 

            Members of the jury, now that you have heard all the evidence, it is my duty to instruct you on the law that applies to this case.  A copy of these instructions will be available in the jury room for you to consult.

            It is your duty to weigh and to evaluate all the evidence received in the case and, in that process, to decide the facts.  It is also your duty to apply the law as I give it to you to the facts as you find them, whether you agree with the law or not. {my emphasis} You must decide the case solely on the evidence and the law.  You will recall that you took an oath promising to do so at the beginning of the case.  You should also not be influenced by any person’s race, color, religious beliefs, national ancestry, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender, or economic circumstances.  Also, do not allow yourself to be influenced by personal likes or dislikes, sympathy, prejudice, fear, public opinion, or biases[.] [, including unconscious biases.  Unconscious biases are stereotypes, attitudes, or preferences that people may consciously reject but may be expressed without conscious awareness, control, or intention.] 

            You must follow all these instructions and not single out some and ignore others; they are all important.  Please do not read into these instructions or into anything I may have said or done as any suggestion as to what verdict you should return—that is a matter entirely up to you.

The federal case is a good point for getting a conviction since the feds win most of the cases they take to trial. I call US Federal practise "Let's make a deal", because unless you can come up with something that interests the Feds, they will hammer your ass.

And in this case, it's the death penalty.

I don't have a lot of time for this kid or his supporters, which should be pretty apparent by now.

Thursday, March 6, 2025

Luigi Mangione--I'm going to say it again

 OK, if all the people who are denying the mountain of evidence against this spoiled, rich kid who probably has a personality disorder would shut the fuck up and work toward something positive, like health care reform, it would make sense.

But they aren't.

Instead they are supporting a murderer for some fucked up reason.

Supporting this scumbag is getting fuck all done for health care reform.

Got it????

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Innocent until proven guilty?

 OK, I get it. According to the US Constitution there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, or at least a judge makes a conviction if the defendent pleads guilty.

BUT

In this case, we have video evidence tracking him that day. He's ID'd and caught with the murder weapon and the ID he used to check into that NYC hostel. I think there's some DNA evidence linking him to the crime in there as well.

And his manifesto is basically a confession, which pretty much takes it out of any exception out there.

It's pretty hard to deny the kid is guilty. And he's not really a very sympathetic defendant.

Hell, even his mother said she could she him doing it!

Unless you have a thing for rich, spoiled brats who might have a personality disorder and wish that he isn't guilty despite the rather overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

So, I'm guessing that his supporters are upset that their insurance is denying the procedure to get their heads surgically removed from their asses.

Oh, and for people talking about Luigi's search being illegal--there's something called "search incident to arrest".

Which is something I'm suprised all those "experts" out there aren't mentioning, but US legal education is crap.

Anyway,

Search Incident to Arrest.—The common-law rule permitting searches of the person of an arrestee as an incident to the arrest has occasioned little controversy in the Court.240 The Court has even upheld a search incident to an illegal (albeit not unconstitutional) arrest.241 The dispute has centered around the scope of the search. Because it was the stated general rule that the scope of a warrantless search must be strictly tied to and justified by the circumstances that rendered its justification permissible, and because it was the rule that the justification of a search of the arrestee was to prevent destruction of evidence and to prevent access to a weapon,2

Let's see, the cops are interrogating a suspected murderer who might be armed...

Of course, the defence wants this evidence suppressed. I mean he's caught red handed with the murder weapon and a confession.

As I said, the people who support him need their heads surgically removed from their anuses.

Saturday, March 1, 2025

What really explains Luigi Mangione fandom

I don't get how a rich, spoiled brat like Mangione can get sympathy for what he did, which is to plan out the killing of a person. He shoots his victim in the back and then runs because deep in his heart Mangione knows he committed a crime. Yet, there are people who support him. They way people found Ted Bundy attractive. Anyway, Reason pretty much sums up how I feel about all this:

Mangione committed a heinous crime: murder. And like an odious person is entitled to a legal defence, the victim is a victim of a crime whether we approve of their morality or not.

A smart kid like Mangione could have worked toward health care reform in a more constructive manner. I don't have sympathy for Mangione. And you need to examine your values if you do.