Showing posts with label Right wing Voter suppression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Right wing Voter suppression. Show all posts

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Multiple Convictions of Voter Fraud by the Republican Secretary of State of Indiana

"If we aren't going to enforce election law against the secretary of state of Indiana, who are we going to enforce it against?" Sigler said.

Brizzi, White's attorney, rested Thursday without presenting a defense.

The Republicans are consistently trying to pass more exclusionary voting laws, laws which appear to disenfranchise those groups who are more likely to vote for democratic candidates than for conservative candidates.

So it is in that context that the convictions of the Indiana Secretary of State is particularly poignant.  I think we can fairly say the entire Republican effort to make it harder to vote is an attempt to game the system, to create a false problem, and then create a solution that is an expansion of government, an intrusion by government that serves their partisan purposes.

This wasn't just ordinary voter fraud, this was voter fraud committed by the person the Republicans ran to be the top person in the state who should have been responsible for PREVENTING voter fraud. Instead, he was committing it.  And Republicans KEPT HIM ON THE JOB as long as they possibly could, which suggests they support voter fraud.  They certainly did nothing to prevent it, they did nothing to acknowledge the concerns raised by the prosecution of this man for voter fraud.  It is precisely because White's claims of NOT living at the condo address were PROVEN false that he has perjury convictions.

Bottom line, when it benefits their political agenda, Republicans do not really care a damn about voter fraud, so long as it benefits them.  They are hypocrites who would emphatically have called for the removal of a Democratic Secretary of State during such a prosecution, and this Republican Secretary of State, and the Republicans nationwide would have happily accused and prosecuted others for this, but when it was one of their own, they kept him in office.  They knew that there were serious reasons to believe his election was not valid.  I applaud the prosecutor who did NOT allow politics to enter into this pursuit of justice.

But to now go further and try to claim the governor has the right to appoint the successor to someone who was not legally elected, who commited voter fraud, but to claim that clean elections are so important we must keep LARGE numbers of people from voting?

THAT is hypocrisy.

From the AP by way of  MSNBC.com
Yup - we're back!
Indiana election chief found guilty of voter fraud
'We believe it was about someone who violated the law and cheated the system — and gamed the system,' prosecutor says


By CHARLES WILSON

updated 2 hours 56 minutes ago 2012-02-04T13:00:33


Indiana's top elections official could lose his job and his freedom after jurors convicted him of multiple voter fraud-related charges Saturday, leaving in flux the fate of one of the state's most powerful positions.


Republican Secretary of State Charlie White has held on to his office for more than a year despite being accused of lying about his address on voter registration forms.


A Hamilton County jury found White guilty of six of seven felony charges, including false registration, voting in another precinct, submitting a false ballot, theft and two counts of perjury. He was acquitted on one fraud charge.


White expressed no outward emotion as the verdict was read, and later said outside the courtroom: "'I'm disappointed for my family and the people who supported me."


White and his attorneys said the fate of his elected post remains unknown and ultimately may have to be decided by the governor or state supreme court. "We will review our options," he said.


Record of public service


White's attorney, Carl Brizzi, said he will ask the judge to reduce the charges to misdemeanors because his client has no criminal background and has a long record of public service.


The jury verdict came after a weeklong trial in which White, who had vigorously protested the charges in hearings before a state elections panel, presented no defense.

Prosecutors said he used his ex-wife's address instead of a condo he had with his fiancee because he didn't want to give up his $1,000-per-month Fishers Town Council salary after moving out of that district. He faced seven felony charges, including voter fraud, perjury and theft.


White, 42, has said the charges ignored a complicated personal life in which he was trying to raise his 10-year-old son, plan his second marriage and campaign for the statewide office he won that November.


He said he stayed at his ex-wife's house when he wasn't on the road campaigning and did not live in the condo until after he remarried.


No sentencing date was set.

Republican special prosecutor John Dowd said he's also unsure about the fate of White's position, but expressed satisfaction about the verdict.


"We believe it was about someone who violated the law and cheated the system — and gamed the system," Dowd said. "And, obviously, the jury thought the same way."


State law bars anyone convicted of a felony from remaining in office. It wasn't immediately clear how quickly White could be replaced or who might succeed him.


Democrat replacement?


A Marion County judge already has ruled that White should be replaced by Democrat Vop Osili, the man he defeated by about 300,000 votes in the November 2010 election, but that ruling is on hold pending an appeal.


But state law allows the governor — in the case, Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels — to appoint a successor.


White has resisted calls to resign from Democrats and Republicans, including Daniels.


Attorney Karen Celestino-Horseman, who watched the trial and spoke on behalf of Indiana Democrats following the verdict, said the party believes White's conviction further affirms that Osili should be secretary of state.


"(White) has been convicted, but the judge has left it open for misdemeanor sentencing. That's something that's going to have to be examined," she said.


During his closing arguments, assistant special prosecutor Dan Sigler Jr. argued that White knew that he was committing voter fraud but did it anyway for political power.


"If we aren't going to enforce election law against the secretary of state of Indiana, who are we going to enforce it against?" Sigler said.


Brizzi, White's attorney, rested Thursday without presenting a defense.


Brizzi told the jury during his closing arguments Friday that White's name was on the condo's bills and documents because he was paying for his fiancee and her children to live there, not because he was himself living at that address.


"Their case is based entirely on assumption, innuendo and leaps," Brizzi said.


White maintains he was staying at his ex-wife's house when he wasn't on the road campaigning and did not live in the condo until after his remarriage.

Friday, October 14, 2011

The Tea Party, Tooth Decay..........
and Voter Suppression in Wisconsin

It is perhaps only amusing to me that a part of the state of Florida -- or as it seems more and more often, Flori-DUH! - hijacked by the Tea Party would succumb simultaneously to their worst anti-science impulses, and to right wing paranoia and---- wait for it! ---- the ubiquitous right wing, factually inaccurate invoking of Hitler myth.

The Tea Party is so inept, their members can't be trusted not to harm themselves with the sharp corner of a Graham cracker, much less should they be trusted to have anything to do with governmental decisions affecting human populations.

In this instance, it is the removal of fluoride from the water. Fluoride is the substance that the prestigious, well-respected, SCIENCE-BASED Center for Disease Control says on their web site, on the page headed Community Water Fluoridation:

Overview

For 65 years, community water fluoridation has been a safe and healthy way to effectively prevent tooth decay. CDC has recognized water fluoridation as one of 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century.
So who better to fact check Flori-DUH! Tea Partiers better than the Florida factcheckers at Politifact.com, who give the Fori-DUH! Tea Partiers a Pants-on-Fire rating, reserved for their most severe level of lying, or being so grossly inaccurate that they pretty much had to work at being ignorant.
The Truth-O-Meter Says:

Say water fluoridation started in Nazi Germany ghettos and death camps to pacify the Jews.

Critics of water fluoridation on Tuesday, October 4th, 2011 in a Pinellas County Commission meeting and web comments

Truth about fluoride doesn't include Nazi myth

Here's a reason to support a Florida county's decision to cut fluoride out of its drinking water: The idea came from the Nazis.

The Nazis put fluoride in water to pacify Jews during World War II, a local resident told members of the Pinellas County Commission on Oct. 4, 2011, before the commission voted 4-3 vote to stop fluoridating water for about 700,000 residents.
"History shows, actually, that in Nazi Germany, one of the first things that they did was add fluoride to the water in the ghettos where the Jews stayed," Matt Leffler of Clearwater said.

Once the St. Petersburg Times published its story about the decision — similar, anonymous comments on the Web piled up:

"Do you guys know where water fluoridation started? In the death camps in WWII."

"There have been many links to cancer going back to the original tests on fluoride done by the Nazis on the Jews."
"It IS what they used to dull their brains!! They used it in the concentration camps. It was in the concentration camps that they also developed many anti-psychotics."

One reader declared the Nazi-fluoride connection "an absolute historical fact." Several readers linked to sources on the Web.

Certainly Nazis, who killed millions of Jews in the 1930s and 1940s, were known for chemical tests and inhumane medical experiments. So PolitiFact Florida had to know: Did that include adding fluoride to water?

We tracked down roots of these claims on the Web, reached out to Holocaust historians, contacted well-known critics of water fluoridation, and read book excerpts and magazine articles and news stories. And we can tell you: There's no teeth to this claim.

This fact-check won't explore the pros and cons of fluoride in your drinking water — though we will note the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls the practice one of the greatest public health achievements of the century. And also that groups of citizens, scientists among them, have been wary of the practice since the 1950s.

We'll focus instead on an Internet meme that's crept into the local public debate over drinking water — one that well-known fluoridation critics would like to see washed away.

"We have done our level best to discourage opponents of fluoridation from using this emotive argument," said Paul Connett, a chemist who directs the anti-fluoridation group Fluoride Action Network and recently co-authored a book called The Case Against Fluoride. "The historical evidence for this assertion is extremely weak. It is sad that the U.S. media has done such a bad job of educating the public on this issue that it is so easy for crazy ideas to fill the vacuum."

• • •

So where does the story come from?

Andy Hollinger, who handles media relations at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, tried not to laugh as we explained our fact-check.

"I can almost guarantee you that is indeed an urban myth," he said. "... That sounds like Conspiracy Theory 101."

But he humored us, putting historian Patricia Heberer on the phone. Her expertise is the German medical community, including Holocaust-era experimentation.

Most Nazi medical experiments, she said, had two themes: new drugs and treatments for common battlefield ailments, from war wounds to typhus, or the more infamous effort to underpin Nazi racial ideas, such as Josef Mengele's twin studies. None of the experimentation that she knows of involved fluoride — for mind control or for healthy teeth.

Meanwhile, in the concentration camp system, as in the ghettos, it would have been surprising if fluoride delivery was a focus — in the final few days before liberation, water lines scarcely delivered water. So, water treated just for the Jews?

"I can't see it," she said.

But she had heard a similar Cold War-era theory. It wasn't about the Nazis fluoridating water. It was the Communists.

• • •

Still, do an Internet search for "fluoride" and "Nazis," and you'll find articles such as "Nazi Connections to Fluoride in America's Drinking Water." The text appears on various sites, and includes the citations "Stephen 1995," and "Bryson 2004."

"Stephen 1995" is likely Ian E. Stephens, author of a 1987 self-published booklet, an extract of which was published in Nexus Magazine in 1995. We tracked down a copy of the article from the magazine's website, an alternative Australian publication covering "health breakthroughs, future science and technology, suppressed news, free energy, religious revisionism, conspiracy, the environment, history and ancient mysteries, the mind, UFOs, paranormal and the unexplained."

It's called "Fluoridation: Mind Control of the Masses?" And in it we meet government research worker Charles Eliot Perkins, who at the end of World War II purportedly learned from a big German chemical producer that it had developed a plan to fluoridate occupied countries.

"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him," says a document quoted in the excerpt. "Both the Germans and the Russians added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile."

"Bryson 2004" is Christopher Bryson, an investigative reporter and television producer who reported on Guatemalan human rights abuses for the BBC World Service, National Public Radio and the Atlanta Journal Constitution in the 1980s, and later wrote a book called The Fluoride Deception. It delves into murky connections between military-industrial fluoride polluters and the early push for public water fluoridation.

His book mentions Nazis or Nazism less than 10 times, and none of the references discuss water fluoridation. We contacted him.

"I never came across any documentation or credible information showing that fluoride was used in Nazi death camps," he said.

• • •

In 2009, two scientists published a book called The Fluoride Wars: How a Modest Public Health Measure Became America's Longest Running Political Melodrama.

The hydrologists dedicate more than 30 pages to conspiracy theories and their origins. We contacted one of them.

"The World War II death camp statement is an absurd lie," said Jay Lehr, who has authored or co-authored more than 30 books, most of them self-described "boring science books for scientists."

The Fluoride Wars instead presents a lively social history of the fluoridation debate in the United States.

And it starts with the first large-scale fluoridation in history, not in Europe, but in Grand Rapids, Mich., in 1945.
• • •

Given the topic, it seems appropriate to conclude with Wikipedia, where we found mention of Nazis and fluoride — in an article listing conspiracy theories: Fluoridation is alternately part of a "Communist, Fascist or New World Order or Illuminati plot to take over the world." It was "pioneered by a German chemical company to make people submissive to those in power." It was "used in Russian prison camps and produces schizophrenia."

Our Holocaust historian knew of no such project. Two book authors who researched the topic, one a journalist, the other a hydrologist, found no credible evidence of such a connection. A leading anti-fluoridation activist repudiates the story. The most commonly cited Web source for the story was a 16-year-old extract in a fringe Australian publication. So we can confidently declare this claim Pants on Fire!
So in that context, I offer this video clip to elaborate on the Tea Party's ignorance and paranoia.  It's bad enough they are foolish enough to believe these conspiracy theories and stupid urban myths, but it is unconscionable that they act on them without checking first to see if there is even a fragment of truth to them.


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
The Tea Party and the segments of the right wing that support them, or at least go along with them, propose and enact measures which are costly, and which are ill-advised and ill-conceived. They harm large segments of our population, they break things which previously worked, they act on the basis of fantasy conspiracies without basis in fact. And they are out of step with an increasingly large number of people in this country who disagree with them and who oppose what they have been doing. Pardon the pun - rightly so.  In trying to give us smaller government and more efficient government, they have broken government, they have proven they cannot govern, and that they have failed ideas to offer.  In all probability, they will be shown the door in 2012, and their efforts will systematically be undone, to fix the harm they have caused.
The only dumbing down we have to fear is from the Tea Party.