Sunday, November 12, 2023

Gideon Levy: Does unconditional support for Israel endanger Israeli voices?

As he says, would Israel be a better country if there wasn't an Israel lobby? The same goes for the US. US support for Israel has probably created more terrorists than had there not been a Nakba. And people of all three religions live in that region (Jews, Christians, and Muslims)

BTW: As of 2015, Palestinian Christians comprise approximately 1–2.5% of the population of the West Bank, and less than 1% in the Gaza Strip. According to official British Mandatory estimates, Palestine's Christian population in 1922 constituted 9.5% of the total Mandatory Palestine population (10.8% of the Palestinian Arab population), and 7.9% in 1946. A large number of Arab Christians fled or were expelled from the Jewish-controlled areas of Mandatory Palestine during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, and a small number left during the period (1948–1967) of Jordanian control of the West Bank for economic reasons.[citation needed] From 1967, during the Israeli military rule, the Palestinian Christian population has increased while as a percentage of the population continued to decrease.

There are also many Palestinian Christians who are descendants of Palestinian refugees from the post-1948 era who fled to Christian-majority countries and formed large diaspora Christian communities. Worldwide, there are nearly one million Palestinian Christians in these territories as well as in the Palestinian diaspora, comprising around 6–7% of the world's total Palestinian population. Palestinian Christians live primarily in Arab states surrounding historic Palestine and in the diaspora, particularly in Europe and the Americas.

Palestine is home to some of the oldest Christian Churches in the world. At least on is in the Gaza Strip and was recently bombed by the IDF.

Saturday, November 11, 2023

Douglas Macgregor: "An Analysis of the Current Situation in Israel"

I think this is a bit old. It's also to the right of me, but I agree with this analysis of the situation. I'm actually suprised that I'm agreeing with a couple of right wingers who I know I don't agree with (OK, Judge Napolitano).

Anyway, this is a pleasant surprise.

I don't dislike Israelis. I am inclined to support the Palestinian struggle for their homeland for a lot of reasons previously stated. But the main point is that unquestioning US support for Israel is not in most nation's interest.

💥FLOWER OF THE FOREST💥SCOTS GUARDS💥BAGPIPES💥

Flowers of the Forest is played at funerals. I'm using it to remember not only the fallen in the wars, but the victims of Zionist terrorism perpetrated by Stern Gang/Lehi, Irgun, Hagana, and their successor force, the Israeli "Defence" Force. The IDF is a force of aggression, not defence.

Wednesday, November 8, 2023

”I am a Zionist, too. I want every Jew to leave for Palestine.”

Please do not conflate support for Israel, Zionism, and being Jewish. That is a fallacy. Look up the quote in the title for confirmation of that assertion.

Christian zionists outnumber Jewish zionists by 20-30 to 1! The charge of anti-semitism is only to shut up people who want to stop this madness.

Tuesday, November 7, 2023

Is there a Hamas tunnel under the Qatari Hospital in Gaza?

I knew it was something related to the hospital. I was guessing an HVAC system. But this also makes sense. A Hamas tunnel would have been much better camouflaged. Israel continually underestimates Hamas, which is a serious tactical error. IDF is only using this to justify its war crime of targeting a hospital.

I hope that the supporters of this Genocide are brought to trial and shamed.

Why Israel Kills So Many Civilians

No surprise since the IDF is the successor to the Zionist terror groups Stern Gang/Lehi, Irgun, and Hagana. The groups responsible for the Nakba, King David Hotel bombing, Folke Bernadotte assassination, and other acts. The attack on the USS Liberty was no accident either. How anyone can support a rogue state like Israel is beyond me.

Monday, November 6, 2023

Israeli comedian slams Israel for apartheid

Amusing: Breaking the Silence, B'Tselem, and Yesh Din, toss in Yesh Gvul and Ometz LeSarev, are all groups I have contact with. Yes, there are Israeli groups who want to recognise Palestinian rights and really work for peace.

I was at a friend's funeral recently where an IDF reservist was there. I wanted to tell him to contact a resister group, but he was too keen on going to fight--even though he admitted the IDF didn't have enough weapons.

Sunday, November 5, 2023

Scott Ritter - "Palestine and Hamas have won.. Israel is in BIG TROUBLE!.."

I'm not commenting other than to say he is correct: 

  1. The only way to eradicate Hamas is to create a Palestinian state (although I would say that means allowing Palestinians back into Israel with full rights of citizenship and the right of return under UN resolution 194).
  2. Ethnic cleansing is a war crime (includes forced relocation)
  3. Hamas is the better military force (watch the video)
  4. Israel's indiscriminate bombing makes them the terrorists.
     

Why The Media Can’t Tell The Truth On Israel & Palestine

There's a reason we aren't seeing anything of substance in this event. It's framed to make Israel look good while ignoring that this is an occupation.



Saturday, November 4, 2023

Hamas’s asymmetric warfare could beat the Israeli military machine

What a lot of people miss in the US is that Hamas wanted to lure the IDF into the Killing ground. And IDF took the bait.

There's a reason IDF isn't showing pictures of the fighting in Gaza.

The title of this is "They destroyed tanks with direct strikes... Scenes of Al-Qassam fighters clashing with the occupation forces..."

Israel was humiliated on 7 Oct 23 by having Hamas invade under its defences. The pro-Israeli media is hyping stories of attacked festival goers and kidnapped civilians, but that is because Hamas beat a couple of IDF units and showed up Mossad and Shin Bet to boot. 

It's hard to say that Israel is a strategic ally in the region since the only thing it does is create more of a mess. Its using its emotions instead of its brain has led it into something which is going to be the Battle of Stalingrad on steroids. Mosul for something more current. Although, Stalingrad is a better example, but Israel's bombing has created something which is going to be super for the defence, and pure hell for the invader. Toss in that Hamas has planned and prepared this for some time.

A more important consideration is that Hamas fighters aren't afraid of death. Israelis are basically cowards.

The best move would be to admit defeat and grant Palestinians their rights, which includes the right of return under UN resolution 194 of 1948.

Or show the spirit of Masada.


Explained: Judaism or Zionism?

OK, I mean someone who believes in the establishment of a Jewish state when I use the term "Zionist". It is not related to any religion since Zionism is an ideology, not a religious or ethnic movement.

This is a good explanation of it and why someone who is protests Zionism and Israel isn't "anti-semitic". Being called "anti-Semitic" when one criticises Israel or Zionism is humourous since Zionists have long been supported by Anti-semites.

Who else would want to see Jews ghettoised other than an anti-semite?

US Senator Chris Van Hollen Accuses Israel of War Crimes

The one good point to all this carnage is that it becomes harder to ignore Israel's rogue behaviour. They have bombed Christian Churches in Gaza (Yes, Palestinians are also Christian) along with hospitals and refugee camps, in contravention to the laws of War.

Israel loses its US support and that is probably a bigger blow than allowing Palestinians their rights, which would show up Israel for the racist state that it is.

Friday, November 3, 2023

Krystallnacht comparisons

 I knew that this event would end up being mentioned, especially at this time of the year.

The usual line is along the line of Alan Dershowitz's Kristallnacht again: Hamas praise & Jew-hatred

Many of the most egregious petitions and protests against Israel occurred even before Israel responded to the Hamas barbarity of Oct. 7. Student groups, lawyers’ groups, Black Lives Matter groups, labor unions, and other hard left, woke progressives praised Hamas for its rapes, beheadings and murders just hours after they occurred. It would be as if these groups increased their support for Nazism following Kristallnacht in 1938, when 91 Jews were killed in Germany and many synagogues and Jewish stores destroyed.

This comparison actually lacks a lot of historical background, but since he starts it with "before Israel responded", let's go with the Nakba. The Israelis have pushed the Palestinians into Gaza and the West Bank and restricted their mobility, among other things.  The Nazi also put European Jews into Ghettos. Some of those Jews revolted:

Vilna, Mir, Lachva (Lachwa), Kremenets, Czestochowa, Nesvizh, Sosnowiec, and Tarnow, among others, resisted with force when the Germans began to deport ghetto populations. In Bialystok, the underground staged an uprising just before the final destruction of the ghetto in September 1943. Most of the ghetto fighters, primarily young men and women, died during the fighting.

The Warsaw ghetto uprising in the spring of 1943 was the largest single revolt by Jews. Hundreds of Jews fought the Germans and their auxiliaries in the streets of the ghetto. Thousands of Jews refused to obey German orders to report to an assembly point for deportation. In the end the Nazis burned the ghetto to the ground to force the Jews out. Although they knew defeat was certain, Jews in the ghetto fought desperately and valiantly.

Likewise there was resistance in the concentration camps: Sobibor, Treblinka, Auschwitz-Birkenau, among others.

Should we condemn the Jews that resisted German repression the way that the Palestinians have been resisting the Nakba, which is something my learned colleague needs to refresh his memory upon. Of course, as a Brit, I am well aware of Stern Gang/Lehi, Irgun, and Haganah and their activities. Do the names  Folke Bernadotte and Walter Guiness mean anything to you, Mr. Dershowitz? Yellin-Mor said this about the assassination of Guiness:

"Really these acts by Lord Moyne were without meaning for us. They were useful only as propaganda, because they allowed us to explain to the people why we had killed him. What was important to us was that he symbolized the British Empire in Cairo. We weren't yet in a position to try to hit Churchill in London, so the logical second best was to hit Lord Moyne in Cairo."

Lehi, Irgun, and Haganah went on to form the IDF.

I can also add that Krystallnacht did not occur in a vacuum. It was an act of terrorism which precipitated that event. The pretext for the attacks was the assassination of the German diplomat Ernst vom Rath by Herschel Grynszpan, a 17-year-old German-born Polish Jew living in Paris.   

As you know, the Jews in Germany were being discriminated against. But I can ask you whether this act justifies the retribution against the entire Jewish community, as is Israel's undeniable Genocide committed against the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Yes, it is Genocide being committed by Israel using the legal black letter definition of that term.

I quoted Sir Gerald Kaufman's speech from "House of Commons Hansard Debates" 16 January 2009 yesterday, and I'll give an excerpt of it today:

My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza. The current Israeli Government ruthlessly and cynically exploit the continuing guilt among gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians. The implication is that Jewish lives are precious, but the lives of Palestinians do not count...

Israel was born out of Jewish terrorism. Jewish terrorists hanged two British sergeants and booby-trapped their corpses. Irgun, together with the terrorist Stern gang, massacred 254 Palestinians in 1948 in the village of Deir Yassin. Today, the current Israeli Government indicate that they would be willing, in circumstances acceptable to them, to negotiate with the Palestinian President Abbas of Fatah. It is too late for that. They could have negotiated with Fatah’s previous leader, Yasser Arafat, who was a friend of mine. Instead, they besieged him in a bunker in Ramallah, where I visited him. Because of the failings of Fatah since Arafat’s death, Hamas won the Palestinian election in 2006. Hamas is a deeply nasty organisation, but it was democratically elected, and it is the only game in town. The boycotting of Hamas, including by our Government, has been a culpable error, from which dreadful consequences have followed. 

The phrase "Never again" is rendered meaningless if it applies only to one group of people, especially Jews. It needs to mean "Never again" for everyone, including Palestinians. Zionists (people who support a Jewish homeland of ANY faith) have been using this as an excuse for the excesses of the State of Israel for too long. And, as I like to point out, a lot of Zionists are Christians who want the state of Israel to start world war III. They couldn't give a shit about the Jewish people. Conflating Zionism and support for Israel with being "anti-Jewish" is a fallacy, as I've also discussed. In fact, Zionism is far more the enemy of the Jews than calling the state of Israel on its treatment of the Palestinians.

You might want to reflect on that fact.

I've also heard it said that look at what you are doing now since that would have been the way you would have acted during the Holocaust. I won't quote Martin Niemoeller since I hope my learned colleague is aware of that quote.

Thursday, November 2, 2023

Sir Gerald Kaufman on the State of Israel. Jewsplainin' the situation

Wow, I've wanted to say this stuff for a while, but I found this on Youtube. Not sure you can call him anti-Semitic, but he is the type of person that gave me the ideas which began to form my opinion of Israel.

Here's his bio on the subject: an advocate of Palestinian statehood. A strong critic of the state of Israel, he called for economic sanctions against the state and denounced the state for committing atrocities (which he phrased as war crimes) against the Palestinian people and their nation.

 

The whole speech from "House of Commons Hansard Debates" 16 January 2009

 Sir Gerald Kaufman (Manchester, Gorton) (Lab): I was brought up as an orthodox Jew and a Zionist. On a shelf in our kitchen, there was a tin box for the Jewish National Fund, into which we put coins to help the pioneers building a Jewish presence in Palestine.

I first went to Israel in 1961 and I have been there since more times than I can count. I had family in Israel and have friends in Israel. One of them fought in the wars of 1956, 1967 and 1973 and was wounded in two of them. The tie clip that I am wearing is made from a campaign decoration awarded to him, which he presented to me.

I have known most of the Prime Ministers of Israel, starting with the founding Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion. Golda Meir was my friend, as was Yigal Allon, Deputy Prime Minister, who, as a general, won the Negev for Israel in the 1948 war of independence.

My parents came to Britain as refugees from Poland. Most of their families were subsequently murdered by the Nazis in the holocaust. My grandmother was ill in bed when the Nazis came to her home town of Staszow. A German soldier shot her dead in her bed.

My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza. The current Israeli Government ruthlessly and cynically exploit the continuing guilt among gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians. The implication is that Jewish lives are precious, but the lives of Palestinians do not count.

On Sky News a few days ago, the spokeswoman for the Israeli army, Major Leibovich, was asked about the Israeli killing of, at that time, 800 Palestinians—the total is now 1,000. She replied instantly that

    “500 of them were militants.”

That was the reply of a Nazi. I suppose that the Jews fighting for their lives in the Warsaw ghetto could have been dismissed as militants.

The Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni asserts that her Government will have no dealings with Hamas, because they are terrorists. Tzipi Livni’s father was Eitan Livni, chief operations officer of the terrorist Irgun Zvai Leumi, who organised the blowing-up of the King David hotel in Jerusalem, in which 91 victims were killed, including four Jews.

Israel was born out of Jewish terrorism. Jewish terrorists hanged two British sergeants and booby-trapped their corpses. Irgun, together with the terrorist Stern gang, massacred 254 Palestinians in 1948 in the village of Deir Yassin. Today, the current Israeli Government indicate that they would be willing, in circumstances acceptable to them, to negotiate with the Palestinian President Abbas of Fatah. It is too late for that. They could have negotiated with Fatah’s previous leader, Yasser Arafat, who was a friend of mine. Instead, they besieged him in a bunker in Ramallah, where I visited him. Because of the failings of Fatah since Arafat’s death, Hamas won the Palestinian election in 2006. Hamas is a deeply nasty organisation, but it was democratically elected, and it is the only game in town. The boycotting of Hamas, including by our Government, has been a culpable error, from which dreadful consequences have followed.

The great Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban, with whom I campaigned for peace on many platforms, said:

    “You make peace by talking to your enemies.”

However many Palestinians the Israelis murder in Gaza, they cannot solve this existential problem by military means. Whenever and however the fighting ends, there will still be 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza and 2.5 million more on the west bank. They are treated like dirt by the Israelis, with hundreds of road blocks and with the ghastly denizens of the illegal Jewish settlements harassing them as well. The time will come, not so long from now, when they will outnumber the Jewish population in Israel.

It is time for our Government to make clear to the Israeli Government that their conduct and policies are unacceptable, and to impose a total arms ban on Israel. It is time for peace, but real peace, not the solution by conquest which is the Israelis’ real goal but which it is impossible for them to achieve. They are not simply war criminals; they are fools.

Can Israel defeat Hamas in its own tunnels?

And the answer is: NO! 

Actually, I've heard that the Israeli forces are pretty weak at this point, which can be born out that most of what is coming out of that area is "hasbara" and not anything of real substance. We are hearing that Israeli raids are directly hitting civilians from the Palestinian side.

 Which is a war crime.

 

The IDF is a "risk adverse" force and tends to retreat when it is being beaten. It will take a certain level of casualties and then run.

They ain't the French Foreign Legion which is best exmplified by the Battle of Camarón, which occurred on 30 April 1863:

A small infantry patrol, led by Captain Jean Danjou and Lieutenants Clément Maudet and Jean Vilain, numbering just 65 men was attacked and besieged by a force that may have eventually reached 3,000 Mexican infantry and cavalry, and was forced to make a defensive stand at the nearby Hacienda Camarón, in Camarón de Tejeda, Veracruz, Mexico.

The conduct of the Legion, who overwhelmingly outnumbered, refused to surrender, killing and injuring hundreds of enemy troops before finally succumbing, led to a certain mystique, and the battle of Camarón became synonymous with bravery and a fight-to-the-death attitude.

 No, the Israeli Military embodies the spirit of Masada, which is where the Jews killed themselves rather than die in battle.

Going into Gaza is going to be the Battle of Stalingrad on steroids. The IDF are fools for thinking they will get too far into Gaza before the shit hits the fan. And the risk adverse IDF won't commit to what is necessary to actually do this.

Especially the body count on their side.

So, they would rather commit the war crime of targeting civilians, which is another blunder since what made the terrain in Stalingrad so difficult was that it was bombed out. That gave the Russian defenders lots of great positions to defend from.

Let's toss in Hamas's tunnels for good measure, which an IDF soldier described as fighting ghosts. Hamas's tunnels make it easy to move from position to position. The IDF will be ambushed on a regular basis by the highly mobile defenders.

And fighting in built up areas (FIBUA) is difficult under normal conditions. The Palestinian won't be the ones being slaughtered if they go into Gaza: it will be the IDF.

Toss in that the Hamas fighters have nothing to lose. They know they are going to die and are willing to take as many IDF with them as they can. That's a very formidable foe.

The real problem with Israel is that it has set itself up for defeat the moment Herzl conceived the Zionist movement and has been living on borrowed time since then.

Maybe Patagonia or Uganda were the better choices for a Jewish state.

Wednesday, November 1, 2023

They say Russia almost became Islamic.

 They say Russia almost became Islamic. The story is that Tsar Jaroslav the Wise during the Kievan Rus wanted to give up paganism. So, he called together representatives from all the world's religions.

The Islamic representative told him he could have all the wives he wanted. Jaroslav said, "Yeah, go on". The Islamic rep said, "But you can't drink alcohol". And Jaroslav was all like "get outta here..."


 

 

Tuesday, October 31, 2023

Holy Crap! How Israel Lies About Literally Everything

I have been aware of hasbara for a while--the best example being the attack on the USS Liberty. How these clowns keep any credibility is beyond me. Well, other than US MSM is a joke and fails to actually do any serious journalism.

Toss in that the Israel lobby has some serious power in the US (this is sort of hermaneutic going back to the USS Liberty incident).

Former British Soldier explains the political situation between Ukraine and Palestine.

Well, I do support both Ukraine and Palestine.

I also don't support the war machine and the duopolitics in the United States.

Sunday, October 29, 2023

More Jewsplainin': Zionism is not the same as Judaism

As I like to say, all it means is that one supports a Jewish homeland. And quite a few zionists are not Jewish. And the ones that aren't Jewish aren't friends of Jews (e.g., Marjorie Taylor Green).







Saturday, October 28, 2023

Jewsplainin' the situation: Gideon Levy - Israel Palestine; The one state solution

This needs to get out there:
Gideon Levy is an Israeli journalist and author. Levy writes opinion pieces and a weekly column for the newspaper Haaretz that often focus on the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories. Levy has won prizes for his articles on human rights in the Israeli-occupied territories.

Friday, October 27, 2023

Hamas's attack on Israel was predictable and will probably happen again.

Believe it or not, there is actually a very simple solution to this situation: Israelis respect Palestinian rights, especially the right of return under UN Resolution 194. "Never again" needs to mean exactly that and it should not apply only to the Jewish people.

Treat others as you would have them treat you.

Otherwise, the hypocrisy which is Yad Vashem being a stone's throw from Deir Yassin means Zionists (a person of ANY faith who believes in a Jewish homeland) and their apologists have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY in this debate.

The only lesson zionists learned from the Holocaust was how to do it to others with the Palestinian people being a case in point. And they really won't like my response to that one if they want to point out how many Jews died in the holocaust.

Then, we can just let you rot in your middle eastern ghetto, which is what should have happened once you failed to respect the UN resolutions against your country.

This video features a Palestinian analyst discussing why Israel is wrong in how it has handled itself in its soon to end lifetime. 

Zionists and their apologists aren't intelligent--they are hypocrites.

If Stern Gang/Lehi, Irgun, and Hagana are to be idealised, then I can give unwavering support to the Palestinians who are fighting to be able to return to their homeland.

It would have been less expensive to have complied with UN Resolution 194 back in 1948, but Israel has been on a path of destruction since before the state of Israel existed--it's just that it's nonsense hasn't been allowed to be discussed.

Israel has been kept on life support for too long--it's time to pull the plug.


Thursday, October 26, 2023

Blowback: How Israel Helped Create Hamas

I think most people would stop supporting Israel if they knew how much of a mess that country is making of the Middle East. Instead, one doesn't criticise Israel. One is kept ignorant that Lehi/Stern Gang, Irgun, and Hagana were originally terrorist organisations, but they went on to become the IDF. Lehi has a definite checkered past and would discredit the state of Israel if its activities were more widely publicised. 

Or, as I like to point out, Deir Yassin is a stone's throw from Yad Vashem.

So much for "Never again", the Zionists have turned around and are acting in a similar manner to how they were treated during the Shoah.

Scrutinise Zionism and you will probably reconsider supporting Israel.

The USS Liberty incident shows that if you are going to stand with Israel, you had better watch your back.

I am predicting that Israel will not last much longer since popular support, as opposed to official support, isn't on their side. Any intelligent person should be ashamed to give support to Zionism.

Especially if they are Jewish. Since most Zionists are CHRISTIANS and they are not friends to the Jewish people.



Sunday, October 22, 2023

Dead in the Water | BBC Four USS Liberty Documentary

The attack on the USS Liberty came close to causing a nuclear attack.

Israel is a "strategic liability of the first order" for the United States and is "the most likely state in the world to take the United States to Armageddon," says Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Sec'y of State Colin Powell.

 


 

Pay attention to the comments from retired Army Col. Lawrence Wilkerson who was the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell who emerged as a leading critic of the neoconservatives. In remarks to Mass Peace Action last June, who has made some serious  assertions about Israel:

  • Israel won’t exist as a state in 20 years because it is delegitimizing itself as an apartheid state.
  • Israel is a “strategic liability of the first order” for the United States and is “the most likely state in the world to take the United States to Armageddon.”
  • The U.S. ought to tell Israel now to “change swiftly” or it will cease to fund and protect Israel, but the U.S. will not do so.
  • The neoconservative agenda in the Middle East was “to set the Levant on fire, to keep Israel’s enemies so at one anothers’ throats” that they could not give Israel trouble.

 Israel is not a strategic ally or an asset--it is the real rogue state in the Middle East and the US needs to stop supporting it.

Saturday, October 21, 2023

Wow, I would have never thought I would agree with Maggie on so many things--except for economics.

 From https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israel-palestine-war-uk-sunak-message-slaughter-carry-on:

 “Margaret Thatcher, Britain’s most feted post-war prime minister, was fiercely pro-Jewish and a powerful enemy of antisemitism. But she was never afraid to call out Israeli war crimes, and did so repeatedly.

When the Israeli army stood by in September 1982 as Christian Phalangists slaughtered Palestinian refugees and Lebanese citizens in the Shatila and Sabra refugee camps, she described the massacres as “an act of pure barbarism”.

And, as historian David Cronin has exposed in an illuminating article for Declassified, she wrote to then US President Ronald Reagan of “an urgent need for a balanced policy”, adding that “unlimited support for Israel can only lead to growing polarisation and despair in the Arab world”...

The historical record shows that Thatcher would have arrived in Tel Aviv swinging her handbag. Of course, she would have extended her deepest sympathy to Israel for the attack on 7 October. But she would also - as a strong supporter of Israel - have given Netanyahu a stern lecture on morality, international law - and global statesmanship.”

The lesson here is that continued warfare and destruction will not end terrorism--it will make it worse.  Israel hasn't learned the lessons of the past 75 years if it continues to try to ethnically cleanse the land. Telling Israel it's making a mistake isn't anti-semitic--it's common sense.

Thursday, October 19, 2023

No background check--No...

Permission to remain in the United States. While I support being able to move to other countries and live in them, I understand the reasons why there are requirements for non-citizens to go through a process for long term residency, or even have a visa for a tourist visit.

I bet that surprised you.  

On the other hand, it shouldn't since international law only gives a free right to enter and exit a nation of the citizens of that nation. It's a privilege for anyone else. Although that can be interesting in other countries since I should technically qualify for Polish citizenship. I probably could have gotten it had I applied after the Iron Curtain dropped, but Brexit created a real run on people applying for EU Citizenship using extenuated circumstances. Toss in the War in Ukraine for good measure. I could get into citizenship by ancestry, but I do not have a heritage in either Ireland or Italy (post unification). Germany sucks for that one since, unlike Italy, it only passes through the father (I guess it really is the Fatherland...).

Anyway, we are seeing poor enforcement of the laws on the books and the effects of crappy laws with crappy enforcement.

Sort of like another issue.

Sunday, August 20, 2023

The problem with US media

 One thing I notice when I watch non-US media (Sky News Australia as an exception) is that they usually try to have opposing opinions. Not so in the US. I have yet to see a serious opposing opinion on the US media. For example, I have yet to see someone who voted for a third party in a discussion of why US politics is screwed.  Even Joe Rogan has not interviewed Jill Stein.

That's pathetic.

OK, I wanted a picture of steak frites...
On the other hand, it might be the reason so much bullshit fills the US debate. For example, instead of anyone questioning the concept of "gun rights" early on, it was accepted. No one in the media pointed out that was a ridiculous concept and totally out of line with history.

Likewise, I heard a Fox News piece on "Climate Change" hypocrisy which didn't feature anyone who had a real idea what goes on in the environmentalist community. So, they were making it sound as if people who are Green are vegan.

Tu rigole ! I like to eat meat, but I don't do it that much for various reasons: more in line with my health than the planet. Slow food, on the other hand, which is traditional and regional cuisine that encourages farming of plants, seeds, and livestock characteristic of the local ecosystem makes more sense to me than having people go vegan. I'm not alone in this since people who push veganism can be shouted down for a lot of reasons: one of which is that truly being vegan is actually a difficult thing to do. Food needs to be certified as vegan!

On the other hand, it doesn't make sense to knock local meat production while eating quinoa flown in from South America.

Anyway, if you really want to get down to it: not having children is the best thing you can do to fight climate change. That gets really interesting when the vegans start their attempts to get people to go on their diet.

The problem is that things are indeed an echo chamber without opinions being challenged.


Saturday, August 19, 2023

‘Coordinated campaign’ to mislead voters: John Ratcliffe

Sure, it's Fox News, but Sky News Australia, The New York Post, and a few others are the only MSM covering this. The big takeaway is "the legislature has the power of the purse", which is pretty much in line with my comment that the US is a de facto parliamentary system.  

Unlike the English Civil War, a change in the balance of power in the US shouldn't be bloody, but will result in a more popular government rising from the ashes.

The question I have for the people who want to say that the US is a "republic, not a democracy", other than what is the difference between the two, is:

"Are you condoning the current corruption in the system?"

Because nothing will change until the government truly becomes one of "We the people", which was  propaganda since the Constitutional Convention was anything but popular.

So, do as you say, not as you do.

Friday, August 18, 2023

No means No

The reality is that I said "No" three times:

  1. The 2008 Primary
  2. the 2016 Primary
  3. And the 2016 General Election

The likelihood of my voting for Hillary Clinton was next to non-existent.[1]

And the Russians had fuck all to do with it.

Unless, of course, Russians run the democratic party, which in retrospect seems to be the case since they pretty much trashed the 2016 election.

Especially since Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, yet LOST IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

The problem is that the duopoly wants to pretend that a vote for a third party is anything but a vote for that party. 2016 was liberating for me since I saw that my vote didn't count.

It doesn't count in primary elections and it also doesn't count in the general election.

Having a "right to vote" is meaningless if the voting is not done in a truly free and fair election with a secret ballot and parties that actually represent the people.

So, please, stop saying that third party voters are spoilers.

Unless we are spoiling the illusion for the duopoly.

Footnote:

[1] I might vote for Hillary Clinton if Ranked Choice Voting were in place, but she would be somewhere after a write in vote for all my dogs and maybe one of the legitimate candidates.

Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Do as I say, not as I do...

It's Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber with the duopoly. I am tired of the lack of serious discourse in US politics. Unfortunately, this nonsense doesn't get mentioned in other countries, which is too bad. 

Russell Brand is the court jester who tells the truth through jest. 

 

"No means no."

Saturday, August 12, 2023

Americans (and Australians) on Climate Change

 A Pew Charitable Trust poll says a few interesting things about US attitudes toward climate change. A two thirds majority of people in the US support prioritising the development of renewable energy sources, yet most of them are not open to the idea of phasing out fossil fuels. I guess this is where I can bring in the Australians. Since Australians and New Zealanders have been using alternative energy for their vehicles and other purposes for some time now. The similarities come in that attitudes toward this subject tend to go along political lines in the US and Antipodes.

Sky News Australia and Fox News are a lot alike when it comes to climate. Which is totally different from European news, which is pretty solid that climate change is real and a problem.

And there is a divide between the "Democratic" and Republican parties about this issue, but even if people in the US accept climate change, they are still not as concerned about that than other issues (even though cities and transportation fit into this very well). Toss in that some people think that climate change doesn't effect them locally.

Which is amusing given my previous post: "the silver lining to climate change".

Despite all this people are willing to join international action to curb climate change.

Wednesday, August 9, 2023

Russell Brand is so good at explaining WHY people need to be concerned about Hunter's laptop

But everyone seems to neglect that a popular candidate, Bernie Sanders, was passed over for candidates like Biden. 

Trump Derangement Syndrome anyone?

I am so with Joe Rogan on this. It's strange how people who would believe anything about Trump pretend to be sceptical about the Bidens when it couldn't be more in your face how bad this is. 

And Biden somehow beat a popular candidate, Sanders, for the "democratic" party nomination.  

And you wonder why I hate the duopoly parties.

Saturday, July 29, 2023

AOC DISMANTLED As Just Another Dem | Breaking Points

My question for the people who want to say that the Democratic Party is in anyway "Socialist":

Why didn't they run Bernie Sanders in 2016 (and 2020)?
Seriously. They fact that they went with Hillary Clinton, and, even worse, ran JOE BIDEN should show that the Democratic party is in no way Socialist.

I liked AOC at first since she said she was a Berner, but she went with the Democratic Party. And now she is doing things like this. I'll let this person dissect her and the Democratic party, but the Democratic Party is not in any way a left leaning party.

.

Friday, July 28, 2023

Meet Pascal Bruckner, author of The Tyranny of Guilt

This interview is in English, please listen to it. 

I learned about this philosopher from an article in Le Figaro about the shooting of Nihel last month and have been reading his books. I don't agree with him on a lot of things, but his positions on racism and "western guilt" totally resonate with me. 

I like that you can hear him speak because I think that he is someone who needs to be more widely publicised in the Anglophone world. I think it is especially important for a lot of white people to hear what he has to say because the "western guilt" of this book has led to a lot of bad results.

Also take a look at "Enlightenment Fundamentalism or Racism of the Anti-Racists?" for a conversation starter. He has some interesting thoughts on race and multiculturalism.

The more I listen to him, the more I like his thoughts on this subject.

Thursday, July 27, 2023

President WHAT???

 One of the interesting things about getting your news from France is that there are a lot of stories about Africa. In this case there has been a coup where President Mohamed Bazoum has been deposed in Niger.

Which is interesting if you are listening to the news...

But it's not spelled the way it sounds or it would be really interesting--especially for Anglophones.

"President Bazoom has been captured in the capital city of Brassiereville...."

Tuesday, July 25, 2023

I just had a very bizarre revelation...

High capacity magazines are banned in Vermont.

Seriously! "Gun friendly Vermont" won't let you buy high capacity magazines as of 1 October 2018. On the other hand, it seems that possession of one is legal? I'm going by this:
https://tinyurl.com/vermontgunlaws

And the word of politicians.

I could get it if there was a lot of gun violence in Vermont. Well, other than the state has the highest rate of gun death in New England.https://vtdigger.org/2021/04/01/allie-breyer-vermont-has-the-highest-rate-of-gun-deaths-in-new-england/ OK, this is suicides, not the type of gun violence most other places see.

It also has had 1 mass shooting in the period from 2013-2019: https://www.gvpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Vermont-Mass-Shootings-State-Fact-Sheet-1.pdf

I am dead certain that the High Capacity Magazine ban has prevented a steep rise in mass shootings.

Did I forget to mention that "assault rifles" are still legal? And you don't need a permit to carry a concealed handgun.

And this mess passed the Vermont Supreme Court. I have this weird feeling that the only person charged under this law will try to take it to SCOTUS, which will probably side with him since he is the stereotypical republican. In fact, he's the stereotypical gun owner.

While I support gun laws: I would like them to make sense.

And this is as out to lunch as you can get. 

Hey, wait!!! Vermont also has recreational cannibis...

I guess we know what the Vermont lawmakers were on when they came up with this.

This: https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/?source=emne_states_courts_20230725&refcode=emne_states_courts_20230725

is what started this. I'm not sure how they came up with their rankings, but this is one of the many reasons I am on the outs with a lot of the "gun violence prevention" organisations. 

Wednesday, July 19, 2023

The parliamentary system explained--it's real simple

The English civil war in the middle of the 17th century was about where the power would like: With the executive (king)? Or the Legislature (parliament)? So, as I said, the system is pretty simple and easy for the US to "adopt".

It just comes from the admission that the power to run the government, as in making laws and that lies in the legislature. The legislature is the body which is the closest to the people. This is why I like it.

It's easier for a third party to gain traction locally than nationally: especially with the current duopoly in power. Likewise, having a true multi-party democracy will require that there are compromises. This is in contrast to the ultra-partisan bullshit in the US. Coalitions need to be formed.

Or a new election is called.

Sure, this may show up the US for the disunited states that it actually is, but those would be better teething pains than what is happening now.

The executive does what it should do: run things. It's the career civil service who administer the government.

And the courts can do what courts should do: decide legal cases like umpires in a game.

Tuesday, July 18, 2023

Supreme Court needs to follow the same ethics rules as other judges (It's bipartisan)

Wow, you would think the people at Fox News would glom onto this like flies on shit, but no...

Yes, indeed, RBG was like all the other pigs on SCOTUS and at the trough. The problem is that anyone familiar with the court knows that they do shit that would get them impeached or at least hit with an ethics violation. But they get away with it.

Just imagine what the Supreme Court might be like if it weren't (1) Political or (2) corrupt.


Get some ethics rules, assholes, because this is well known in the legal community. It's the poor schmucks who think you are worthy of respect that are clueless.

Oh, and I would welcome the legal circus that I would make if you decide to come after me: especially since you know I am right. And so do a lot of other people.

Do you really want this coming to light? A little late: https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/why-doesnt-the-supreme-court-have-a-formal-code-of-ethics/

What do you think the ABA will do?

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

What could be more American than a mass shooting in Philadelphia on Independence Day?

 Or what don't you get about:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Don't say "well regulated means well trained" since Shays' rebels were well trained. Well regulated is defined as: "in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power." (Virginia Declaration of Rights 1776) In fact, that document pretty much sums up what the Second Amendment is about:

Section 13. That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

A miltia isn't whatever the fuck you want to pretend you are--it is a body which is defined by law and under strict subordination to the civil power.

You are committing treason if your militia isn't set up under Article I, Section 8, Clause 16 and acting under authority of clause 15. In fact, Treason is the only crime defined in the US Constitution, Article III, Section iii:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

The definition of Treason in US law is very specific.

So, if you want to pretend that you are an "oathkeeper" or that you are within the constitution, I would like you to pause and consider if you are truly acting under lawful authority?

Or are you just being a total fuckwit and acting like a fool?

I don't give a shit what those clowns on the "supreme court" want to say since they don't have the constitutional authority to rule on the subject.

And they sure as fuck don't have the authority to invalidate laws which are for public safety.

But as I said in the title: "What could be more American than a mass shooting in Philadelphia on Independence Day?"

I hope the fuckwits on the supreme court can get that through the shit that clogs their skulls.

My ancestors shouldn't have capitulated at Morristown. They were "well trained" too.

And if you want to understand what the Second Amendment is about, then you should know about this forgotten bit of history. It's not the statue in Massachusetts, it's the lack of memorial to the militia soldiers who sacrificed for your freedom to be an asshole:

The Pennsylvania Line Mutiny, its Origins and Patriotism

read it and learn what you have been misunderstanding all this time.

Monday, July 3, 2023

Want to watch people in the US Freak out? PART 2

I saw a clip which featured John Oliver bemoaning the "militarised police" in the US. It made me wonder if he had ever traversed La Manche. Or is he like his insular Amerloque cousins and stuck in a place where police never carry guns, which is actually a myth since British Police are armed. They just aren't armed to the extent of the French. The headline from Le Monde states: 

Urban riots: the use of elite police and gendarmerie units, a "conscious" strategy

BRI, RAID, GIGN... by calling in these intervention units, the Minister of the Interior wanted to make an impact. According to his entourage, this is a choice that has been "assumed and asserted".

I've already mentioned GIGN, Groupe d'intervention de la Gendarmerie Nationale, which is the internal version of something akin to the US's Delta Force. The other two, the brigade de recherche et d’intervention (BRI) and Recherche, Assistance, Intervention, Dissuasion (RAID) are similar units from the Police Nationale. Since 2009, RAID and the Paris Research and Intervention Brigade (BRI), a separate National Police unit reporting directly into the Paris Police Prefecture (French: Préfecture de police de Paris), have formed a task force called National Police Intervention Force (French: Force d'intervention de la Police nationale) or FIPN. When activated, the task force is headed by the RAID commander.

Renault Sherpa

This is a definite show of force as the Le Monde article points out:

"Show of force

The tone and method are changing. "Systematic intervention instructions have been given to the police", he tweeted on Thursday 29 June. That very morning, as part of the Reinforced Operational Coordination in Conurbations and Territories initiative, an initial decision authorised the gendarmerie's security and intervention platoons to take action in police zones. Then came the decision to deploy elite police and gendarmerie units in the field. According to the minister's entourage, this was a "demonstration of force that was fully assumed and claimed, with a dual operational and psychological objective".

The aim was to regain the initiative by pushing the rioters, far from the usual policing strategy, which theoretically consists of keeping the demonstrators at a distance. RAID and BRI armoured vehicles were deployed as close as possible to the clashes. At the request of the public authorities, three additional vehicles have even been loaned urgently by the manufacturer, Arquus, without the company having had time to repaint their sand-coloured livery, which is more reminiscent of military operations in the Sahel than the urban maze of the housing estates in the Paris region. For its part, the gendarmerie is lining up its brand new 4 × 4 Centaure, behemoths measuring 7.4 metres long and 14.5 tonnes, and instructing its helicopters to take off at 7pm, before nightfall, to fly over sensitive areas and provide information.

I also find that the concepts in Déclaration des droits de l'Homme et du citoyen de 1789, which was the original constitution of the First French Republic and has remained in spirit in later constitutions, to be very interesting in how they relate to the obligations between the citizen and the government.

Article XII – The guarantee of the rights of man and of the citizen necessitates a public force: this force is thus instituted for the advantage of all and not for the particular utility of those in whom it is trusted.

The concept here is the maintenance of order which is also mentioned in the US Constitution (i.e.: insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence). The US Constitution makes it clear that it has a similar attitude toward insurrection, but the force charged with suppressing insurrections is the Militia (Article I, Section 8, clause 15) which is theoretically closer to the "people" than that of the French system.

There is another post on the difference between US policing and French policing, but I will say that the founders were well aware of the French system. The founders chose to stick with the British system for the most part. But there weren't organised police forces at that time in the British world.

On the other hand, the US Second Amendment has been reinterpreted in such a way that it is removed from its original context. One can arm themselves legally to a level equal to the police: maybe not that of the French Police. Does such an arms race mean that the British system is obsolete and that the police do need to be militarised?

Friday, June 30, 2023

Want to watch people in the US Freak out?

I mentioned in my previous posts on the differences between the French Gendarmerie Nationale and the Police Nationale: the main one is that the Gendarmerie is an internal army--complete with special forces unit, the GIGN.

This headline is pointing out that the Gendarmerie Nationale is deploying its tanks to combat the riots.

Imagine how that would go over in the States!

Although calling Centaure a tank might be a bit of an overstatement. It's more like an armoured car, but it's still far more of a militarised vehicle than a police car. Here's the French Ministry of the Interior's page on it:
https://www.gendarmerie.interieur.gouv.fr/gendinfo/actualites/2021/centaure-le-nouvel-engin-blinde-de-la-gendarmerie

Soframe, the manufacturer's, webpage for it:
https://soframe.com/us/catalogue/arive-armoured-infantry-vehicle/

The proper name for this is "ARIVE" (for ARmoured Infanty VEhicle). It replaces the véhicule blindé à roues de la Gendarmerie (VBRG) which is a little like the Russian BRDM-2 armored car. Here is the ARIVE in action:

While people in the US might bemoan things like this on their streets--it would probably keep the Kyle Rittenhouses out of the action. 

Especially if an LE sniper would target anyone foolish enough to carry a weapon during a riot.

Thursday, June 29, 2023

Unrest in L'Île de France

OK, I'll start this out by pointing out something I like about European cities: the slums are in the suburbs! So, Centre City Paris is peaceful while the 'burbs are blowing up. Anyway,

I'm sure most Americans are missing this, but a 17 year old was shot in Nanterre, which is in the Hauts-de-Seine, or the Western Suburbs of Paris. It's actually Departement 92, not 93. Still, I'll put up this song.

Time to get serious here since it's relates to police shooting someone during a traffic stop, something which happens in the US. But one difference is that there might be a firearm present in the states--less of a possibility in France, but not totally unknown. On the other hand, cops shooting someone is a whole lot less common in France. I'm not totally sure how different the concept of "legitimate defence" is in France. Toss in the law was relaxed in 2017. It's also against the law to comply with a police officer.

This is the French law on the use of firearms by the "guardians of the peace": According to article L. 435-1 of the French Internal Security Code, police officers and gendarmes may only use firearms in five very distinct and clearly described situations:

  • When their lives or physical integrity are threatened or when armed persons threaten their lives, their physical integrity or that of others.
  • When, after two loud summonses, they cannot otherwise defend the premises they occupy or the persons entrusted to their care (a privilege reserved exclusively for the gendarmes prior to 2017).
  • When, immediately after two loud summonses, they cannot compel persons to stop, other than by the use of weapons, if they are trying to escape from their custody or their investigations and if, in their flight, they are likely to cause injury to themselves or to others.
  • When they are unable to immobilise, other than by the use of weapons, vehicles, boats or other means of transport, the drivers of which do not comply with the order to stop and the occupants of which are likely, in their flight, to cause injury to themselves or to others.
  • For the sole purpose of preventing the recurrence, in the near future, of one or more murders or attempted murders that have just been committed, when they have real and objective reasons for considering that such a recurrence is likely in the light of the information available to them at the time they use their weapons.

In addition to the question of legitimate self-defence under one of the above criteria, there are also the issues of resisting arrest and fleeing from the police--which is criterion #3 above. Also, the police office in question was saying he feared for his companion's life, but that is under question based upon the video of the arrest.

The interesting bit is that the victim had been the subject of as many as five police checks since 2021 - what are known as refus d'obtempérer - refusals to co-operate. So, he sort of knew the drill, but decided to run anyway despite his reputation of being well liked and a good kid. I'm going to add that the 2005 riots were started when when two teenagers were electrocuted as they fled police after a game of football and ran into an electricity substation in the Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois.

 Yes, you can see the bullet in the magazine.

So, you don't need to have a cop kill you to start a riot--just do something stupid. That seems to be the case here as well since the cop had a gun drawn. I would add that the 2017 law made the cops a bit more trigger happy according to some people.

On the other hand, having been through a few police roadblocks in Ireland, you should take a hint if the cops are carrying weapons, especially obviously cocked machineguns where you can see the bullet, that trying to avoid the roadblock might be a bad idea. 

Even if you are white in a safe place like Ireland.

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

Why US Malls Are Dying (And Why European Malls Aren't)

I had a weird feeling that number 3 would be what it is (no spoilers--watch the thing). Nope, I wouldn't live in North America even if all the changes I would like to see happened for a bunch of reasons.

Sunday, June 25, 2023

I was curious as to what exactly would be the effect of Elon Musk taking over Twitter.

Disclaimer: I am a shareholder in a few tech companies! I also subscribe to the UN's Principles for Responsible Investment (unpri.org). Even then I let my Luddite tendencies run amok.  Yeah, it's fun asking Microsoft why our products are shit, yet we have a monopoly at the shareholder meetings...

But the real reason I am writing this is that Twitter has become crap since Elon Mush has taken it over. I guess when you have a family that made its money in blood diamonds investing in your projects you can go wild and make shitloads of money

On paper

The problem with this bubble is that it is tulipmania waiting to explode, but there are probably darker forces behind the bubble, as in the surveillance state.

So, you might want to start making posts about how much support gun control, in fact banning guns sounds really good, if you are a ardent gun rights supporter because just remember who REALLY invented the internet. AND IT WASN'T AL GORE OR , EVEN, MORE IMPORTANTLY, TIM BERNERS-LEE!!

The origins of the Internet date back to the development of packet switching and research commissioned by the United States Department of Defense in the late 1960s to enable time-sharing of computers. The primary precursor network, the ARPANET, initially served as a backbone for the interconnection of regional academic and military networks in the 1970s to enable resource sharing.
Yeah, somebody is way ahead of the hackers, but that's another thing.

And it doesn't really matter since I am not keen on social media, especially if I am not connecting with the people I need or want to connect with.

 And I'm not on twitter.

It seems that Mush's buying Twitter may be the end of the line.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/13/twitter-lose-users-elon-musk-takeover-hate-speech

Why "exotic tourism" like what happened on the Titanic is a bad idea.

This man is telling the truth. I have to admit that I am surprised that people are going to the Titanic on a regular basis. Wasn't it supposed to be closed off?

 

Saturday, June 24, 2023

The Silver lining to the problem of climate change...

Bye, Bye Red States. This is what you get for climate change denial!!!

This map is the climate resilience screening index map, which is a map of  the climate resilience screening index, which is designed to be sensitive to changes in the natural environment, built environment, governance, and social structure and vulnerability or risk to climate events. CRSI has been used to develop an index score for climate resilience at the county level (scalable both upward and downward spatially) the represents both the vulnerability of the entity to multiple climate events and the potential recoverability of these entities from climate events. The approach uses five domains (natural environment, built environment, governance, social structures and risk) and 20 indicators related to the domains. CRSI characterizes holistic climate resilience throughout the US at the county level (2000-2015); ascertains the relationships among those domains and indicators; and, provide information regarding how that resilience score is constructed and the actions a community/county can take to improve their climate resilience.

The short form: it's how badly you are screwed when the effects of climate change start becoming even more obvious. And hard to remediate: as in forget electric cars--you're gonna need a bike, or to walk.

It's too bad that most red states are pro-life as well since they can't claim Darwin Awards for ignoring science and the weather warnings. At least we won't have to listen to their stupid comments any more.

Friday, June 23, 2023

Don't like socialism, subsidies, and government regulation? Think about this one!

I wasn't going to comment about this, but watching James Cameron talk about the rescue being a charade: especially after hearing a sound like an implosion. He raises a lot of good points--the main one being qualms about the carbon fibre technology used for the sub. Also, testing the sub's hull for integrity. 

Still, think of all the money wasted on trying to find something which blew up because a bunch of people with more dollars than sense wanted to look at the Titanic. Just think of who is paying the bill for all this.

  

In 2019, OceanGate said it was concerned the certification process could slow down development and act as a drag on innovation. “Bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation,” it said.

See this for a more detailed description of why this libertarian bullshit is WRONG! https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/23/titanic-sub-us-navy-james-cameron-detected-likely-implosion-titan-submersible

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

And now back to useful things.........The Dumbest Excuse for Bad Cities

Yeah, I know that the 1619 project and related rubbish would like us to believe that racism is the cause of all the urban problems, but that is a really bad excuse for doing nothing. My question is how can there be institutional racism if there are black people in positions of power? Like the president of the United States for 8 years was BLACK.

Please answer that before making any criticisms. And you might want to watch this as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTsqRHQ53rA. I would point out that class and wealth might be more important to look at than race, you might want to look up Ursula Burns as well.

And back to more important and useful issues. Thanks.

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

Let's not forget who happened to be one of history's biggest racists...

Yes, it's Idi Amin Dada!

Seriously, if we are going to get into how to be "anti-racists" maybe we need to start with ourselves. And black people need to admit that whites don't have a monopoly on being racist, which is why I mention Idi Amin.

A lot of the kids I was in school and University with happened to be victims of his expulsion of the Asians from Uganda. So, Amin wasn't just out to beat up on the colonial British. On the other hand, he considered himself the King of Scotland. Yep, he declared  himself: “His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.” He never won the DSO and MC, and the VC was his own medal the Victorious Cross.

He once said: “I myself consider myself the most powerful figure in the world.” And he really did claim to be the uncrowned king of Scotland, largely because of his love for pipe bands. 

So, not only was he a racist--he was a total headcase.

And his expulsion of 80,000 Ugandan Asians totally trashed the economy of Uganda. Amin was overthrown in April 1979 and died in exile in Saudi Arabia on August 16, 2003.

So, keep that in mind when you want to paint one group of people with the same brush.


Sunday, June 18, 2023

Fred Hampton and Racial Harmony

From "The Underhanded History of the US"

I have a lot of respect for Fred Hampton. He was probably one of three leaders who might surprise people as to how inclusive they were since most people don't associate Malcolm X with being inclusive. Malcolm's going on the Hajj changed his perspectives toward race which may have led to his assassination by the Nation of Islam (see Netflix's Who Killed Malcolm X). Likewise, Martin Luther King may have been too far to the left for the establishment.

 But I want to talk about Fred Hampton.  A short bio of Hampton is:

He came to prominence in Chicago as deputy chairman of the national Black Panther Party and chair of the Illinois chapter. As a progressive African American, he founded the anti-racist, anti-classist Rainbow Coalition, a prominent multicultural political organization that initially included the Black Panthers, Young Patriots (which organized poor whites), and the Young Lords (which organized Hispanics), and an alliance among major Chicago street gangs to help them end infighting and work for social change. A Marxist–Leninist,  Hampton considered fascism the greatest threat, saying, "nothing is more important than stopping fascism, because fascism will stop us all.”

He majored in pre-Law and used his knowledge of the law in his community police supervision project. I would like to think he was intelligent enough to not have been as into armed self-defence since that was the ostensible reason for his assassination. My opinion was that he was someone who would have unified diverse groups into a viable resistance. Divide and conquer has long been a tactic of repression and I think he was well aware of that. Or to use his own words:

"We got to face some facts. That the masses are poor, that the masses belong to what you call the lower class, and when I talk about the masses, I'm talking about the white masses, I'm talking about the black masses, and the brown masses, and the yellow masses, too. We've got to face the fact that some people say you fight fire best with fire, but we say you put fire out best with water. We say you don't fight racism with racism. We're gonna fight racism with solidarity. We say you don't fight capitalism with no black capitalism; you fight capitalism with socialism"

J Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, Knew that the radical coalitions that Hampton forged in between the Black Panthers, Young Patriots, Young Lords, and other groups in Chicago were a stepping stone to the rise of a revolution that could cause a radical change in the United States. I'm not sure what the exact course of events were that led to the brutal murder of Fred Hampton, but it was planned at high levels. The Chicago police announced the hit squad who killed Hampton had been attacked by the "violent" and "extremely vicious" Panthers and defended themselves accordingly. 

But Hampton didn't shoot back. He had been drugged and was slaughtered in his sleep. This is why I would like to believe he wasn't tooled up and knew that option was not the best choice. I would like to believe that he knew that being non-violent does not mean being submissive, but it also doesn't mean being a fool.  Unfortunately, he let the wrong person into his inner circle.

I'm not sure how much I agree with Judas and the Black Messiah, but the bottom line is that Hampton was someone who understood what the issues were, and still are, in US culture. I imagine him being the first black president. Even sadder is the fact that he was sold out by a Judas and we are left waiting for a second, or first, coming.

Then Bernie Sanders would have seemed conservative if Fred Hampton had been around.

Mentioning Fred Hampton is the best way to celebrate today. Focusing on the issues that effect us all is the best way to remember him. I wish I could have him say it, but the quote above pretty much does the job.

I am hopeful that there is another Fred Hampton out there who will work to unify the races because he really speaks the truth to power. It's hard to believe that such a person doesn't exist in the age of the internet. We need the new black messiah to straighten things out between the races.

But will people listen to that person?

Juneteenth and THE BIG LIE with Baba the Storyteller

I find this interesting since he is from Texas and he talks about his memories of how Juneteeth was celebrated. His story is a totally different take on the narrative we are given that General Granger told the slaves of Galveston that they were free.

He gives a good reason for why this holiday should be celebrated by taking it out of the popular context. But he points out he is from Texas and has a bias toward this celebration, as do a lot of other people who have promoted it. Juneteenth was not nationally known until recently. For the longest time, it was been something mostly celebrated by African Americans, Black Americans in Texas, and millennials. I'm not sure whether its becoming a Federal Holiday has actually led to any real acceptance.

I'm not sure that Juneteenth can keep up with the hype surrounding it. It was probably counterproductive to push this onto people without any real connection to the history behind the event. The fact that some black people in Texas would gather around for a barbecue isn't really a reason that will get people to pay attention to WHY it should be celebrated.

In fact, it works better for the people who want to virtue signal without substance.

Another take on this:


See also:

Juliette Greco and Miles Davis?!?!?!?!?!!!

I have no problem with the interracial aspect, but, I have always thought this was a musical odd couple: sort of like Johnny Rotten and Marie Osmond. Well, it's been confirmed by Mademoiselle Greco herself:

I wasn't tempted to sing with Miles: why try to do badly, or less well, something that other people do so well? I'm not going to start singing jazz standards: it's not in my blood or my culture. Mind you, I have a deep affection and huge admiration for Ella Fitzgerald and a few others.
 

It's interesting how US blacks would come to France and experience freedom. Joesphine Baker sang that she had two loves, her home country and Paris. And for good reason.

The reason this relationship ended was:

At four o'clock in the morning I got a call from Miles, who was in tears. "I couldn't come by myself," he said. "I don't ever want to see you again here, in a country where this kind of relationship is impossible." I suddenly understood that I'd made a terrible mistake, from which came a strange feeling of humiliation that I'll never forget. In America his colour was made blatantly obvious to me, whereas in Paris I didn't even notice that he was black.

Although, it may never have truly ended:

Between Miles and me there was a great love affair, the kind you'd want everybody to experience. Throughout our lives, we were never lost to each other. Whenever he could, he would leave messages for me in the places I travelled in Europe: "I was here, you weren't."
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2006/may/25/jazz