This afternoon, July 15th, the DC Court of Appeals issued a decision supporting the District of Columbia, which has some unique legislative issues due to its unusual status.
The decision opens,
"THOMPSON, Associate Judge: The specific issue before us in this appeal is whether the
District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the “Board”) acted lawfully when it rejected
appellants’ proposed initiative measure on the ground that the measure would authorize, or have the
effect of authorizing, discrimination prohibited by the Human Rights Act,
and therefore was not a
proper subject of initiative. As will be seen, however, the underlying issues are much broader and
more fundamental. They concern (1) the allocation of the power to enact laws governing the District
of Columbia, within the framework of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act; (2) the broad
legislative authority that Congress conferred on the Council of the District of Columbia (“the
Council” or “the Home Rule Council”), subject to specific enumerated limitations; (3) the deference
this court owes to the Council with respect to the meaning of the law that the Council passed to
enable the people of the District of Columbia to share in the Council’s legislative power through an
amendment to the Home Rule Charter"
and can be read in its entirety here:
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/10-CV-20_JACKSON_MTD.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment