Do you ever get tired of that insincere patriotism from the right claiming to support our military?
Yeah, me too.
As noted by the blog Down with Tyranny, 104 Republicans voted to reduce benefits for seniors and vets. I suppose you are doubly screwed if you are senior who also served in our armed forces.
We know how the right hates that 47% of people who receive government benefits, no matter what the reason, no matter who you are, unless you are a rich person in the top of the 1% or a corporation or other special interest on the right.
ZERO democrats voted to reduce those benefits.
I recommend following the link to see how Minnesota members of Congress voted. Well, Minnesota members minus Michele Bachmann, who has such a poor attendance record already in congress. She wasn't there to vote at all. Again.
She must have been off doing her usual right wing media bubble appearances, or maybe fund raising in some other state than Minnesota. Although now that she is facing the same candidate that she had to outspend `12 to 1 to BARELY defeat, she might actually make an occasional visit to the district she doesn't live in - for a change.
Down with Tyranny, (they're on our blog roll - read 'em, they do good stuff!):
The GOP is trying to decide how to best use Obama's screw up on Chained CPI for their own purposes. It's a Republican Party policy that he foolishly adopted for his dead-in-the-water budget at the urging of Boehner and McConnell. When will he ever learn that their ideas are toxic? (That's a rhetorical question; he'll never learn.) But while some Republicans praise the idea or say it doesn't go far enough, the chairman of the NRCC, Greg Walden (R-OR) has decided to use it in an attack against Democrats aimed at seniors and people who expect to be seniors someday. H was quick to run to CNN and tell Wolf Blitzer viewers that "the budget really lays out kind of a shocking attack on seniors, if you will. And we haven't seen all the detail yet, and we'll look at it, but I'll tell you, when you're going after seniors the way he's already done on Obamacare, taking $700 billion out of Medicare to put into Obamacare, and now coming back at seniors again, I think you're crossing that line very quickly here in terms of denying access to seniors for health care in districts like mine, certainly, and around the country. I think he's going to have a lot of pushback from some of the major senior organizations on this and Republicans, as well... you're trying to balance this budget on the backs of seniors and I just think it's not the right way to go."
And yet... and yet... 104 House Republicans already voted for Chained CPI on March 20th, when it was presented as part of the Republican Study Committee's alternative budget. So whatever game Walden wants to try playing, the candidates he's charged with reelecting aren't running against Barack Obama. They're running against Democrats who, in most instances are strongly opposed to Chained CPI, no matter if it's being proposed by Boehner, Obama or a bunch of crackpot extremists. Let's take Buck McKeon, for example. McKeon is an extremist in a moderate suburban Los Angeles area district (CA-25). His likely opponent in 2014 will be Dr. Lee Rogers, one of America's most distinguished podiatric surgeons, a man who already came closer to beating McKeon than anyone else in his career. As soon as Alan Grayson and Mark Takano circulated their letter pledging not to vote for any cuts to benefits for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, Rogers announced he would have signed it on the day it was drafted. "As a doctor I am adamantly opposed to cutting benefits to our population in most need. I announced several weeks ago, I would have been a day-one signer of the letter Mark Takano and Alan Grayson authored pledging to protect seniors and veterans from cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits, including chained CPI." So for voters in Santa Clarita, Antelope Valley and Simi Valley, there is a clear choice: McKeon (and Obama) want to cut social security benefits for seniors and veterans using Chained CPI. Rogers is adamantly opposed. 104 Republican incumbents are in the same boat and although most of them are crazy fanatics in gerrymandered blood red districts with constituents as ignorant as they are, there are several, like McKeon, in more precarious political positions.
read the rest here
Yeah, me too.
As noted by the blog Down with Tyranny, 104 Republicans voted to reduce benefits for seniors and vets. I suppose you are doubly screwed if you are senior who also served in our armed forces.
We know how the right hates that 47% of people who receive government benefits, no matter what the reason, no matter who you are, unless you are a rich person in the top of the 1% or a corporation or other special interest on the right.
ZERO democrats voted to reduce those benefits.
I recommend following the link to see how Minnesota members of Congress voted. Well, Minnesota members minus Michele Bachmann, who has such a poor attendance record already in congress. She wasn't there to vote at all. Again.
She must have been off doing her usual right wing media bubble appearances, or maybe fund raising in some other state than Minnesota. Although now that she is facing the same candidate that she had to outspend `12 to 1 to BARELY defeat, she might actually make an occasional visit to the district she doesn't live in - for a change.
Down with Tyranny, (they're on our blog roll - read 'em, they do good stuff!):
The GOP is trying to decide how to best use Obama's screw up on Chained CPI for their own purposes. It's a Republican Party policy that he foolishly adopted for his dead-in-the-water budget at the urging of Boehner and McConnell. When will he ever learn that their ideas are toxic? (That's a rhetorical question; he'll never learn.) But while some Republicans praise the idea or say it doesn't go far enough, the chairman of the NRCC, Greg Walden (R-OR) has decided to use it in an attack against Democrats aimed at seniors and people who expect to be seniors someday. H was quick to run to CNN and tell Wolf Blitzer viewers that "the budget really lays out kind of a shocking attack on seniors, if you will. And we haven't seen all the detail yet, and we'll look at it, but I'll tell you, when you're going after seniors the way he's already done on Obamacare, taking $700 billion out of Medicare to put into Obamacare, and now coming back at seniors again, I think you're crossing that line very quickly here in terms of denying access to seniors for health care in districts like mine, certainly, and around the country. I think he's going to have a lot of pushback from some of the major senior organizations on this and Republicans, as well... you're trying to balance this budget on the backs of seniors and I just think it's not the right way to go."
And yet... and yet... 104 House Republicans already voted for Chained CPI on March 20th, when it was presented as part of the Republican Study Committee's alternative budget. So whatever game Walden wants to try playing, the candidates he's charged with reelecting aren't running against Barack Obama. They're running against Democrats who, in most instances are strongly opposed to Chained CPI, no matter if it's being proposed by Boehner, Obama or a bunch of crackpot extremists. Let's take Buck McKeon, for example. McKeon is an extremist in a moderate suburban Los Angeles area district (CA-25). His likely opponent in 2014 will be Dr. Lee Rogers, one of America's most distinguished podiatric surgeons, a man who already came closer to beating McKeon than anyone else in his career. As soon as Alan Grayson and Mark Takano circulated their letter pledging not to vote for any cuts to benefits for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, Rogers announced he would have signed it on the day it was drafted. "As a doctor I am adamantly opposed to cutting benefits to our population in most need. I announced several weeks ago, I would have been a day-one signer of the letter Mark Takano and Alan Grayson authored pledging to protect seniors and veterans from cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits, including chained CPI." So for voters in Santa Clarita, Antelope Valley and Simi Valley, there is a clear choice: McKeon (and Obama) want to cut social security benefits for seniors and veterans using Chained CPI. Rogers is adamantly opposed. 104 Republican incumbents are in the same boat and although most of them are crazy fanatics in gerrymandered blood red districts with constituents as ignorant as they are, there are several, like McKeon, in more precarious political positions.
read the rest here
Being oneathemthere geezer vets I think it's fairly easy to parse what's going on.
ReplyDeleteWhen anyone who objected to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (March, 2002--January 23,2009) was a MurKKKahatin'commiehippysonuvabitch, the reptilicans, as much as it prodded their gag reflex had to pass legislation that included increased funding for the VA. Now that the war is badevilrunbyablackguy it's okay to not only not INCREASE funding for the VA but to work at gutting it. Everybody knows that allathem shot-up, traumtized vets are really Murkahatin' hippie malingerers.
I hear a lot of criticism of President Obama around the fact that he always tries to "accomodate" the reptiliscum congresscritters and compromise his principles. This is a fact: he is getting no help from the "blue dogs" on any of these things and the republicans vote en bloc to torpedo virtually everything proposed by him or congress. Then, having blocked ANY movement towards sensible legislation they tell the SLMSM that HE is the one who is keeping things from happening. It's bullshit.
ReplyDelete