Monday, July 1, 2013

Honoring the lost fire fighters in Arizona

If you are comfortable with social media, the image below is from facebook; please pay your respects, if you are so inclined, here: https://www.facebook.com/InMemoryOfPrescottFirefightersLost6302013
These deaths are indirectly the result of human caused global warming. We have increased heat, drought, drastic changes in weather patterns, more frequent and volatile or intense storms, flooding, etc. Prolonged drought in part created the conditions in which such fires can become abnormally strong and difficult to contain, while dramatic decreases in available water make fire fighting more difficult.

Only the right wing nuts in this country seriously disbelieve the overwhelmingly accepted science that there is a man-made problem of global warming. It is not a curse from God, it is our own curse on ourselves from man-made stupid. It has nothing to do with gays or abortion, and everything to do with willful ignorance. There is world wide consensus on the problem of global warming; only here in the U.S. are we leading the world in stupid, because of the insanity and willful ignorance of the right wing extremists like the Tea Party.  ONLY among the willfully stupid and ignorant in the US is there any substantial rejection of the definitive science of global warming:

The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is more than 90% certain that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.[1][2][3][4] This scientific consensus is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these high level reports and surveys.
National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on climate change. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), summarized below:
  • Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5]
  • Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6]
  • "Benefits and costs of climate change for [human] society will vary widely by location and scale.[7] Some of the effects in temperate and polar regions will be positive and others elsewhere will be negative.[7] Overall, net effects are more likely to be strongly negative with larger or more rapid warming."[7]
  • "[...] the range of published evidence indicates that the net damage costs of climate change are likely to be significant and to increase over time"[8]
  • "The resilience of many ecosystems is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate change, associated disturbances (e.g. flooding, drought, wildfire, insects, ocean acidification) and other global change drivers (e.g. land-use change, pollution, fragmentation of natural systems, over-exploitation of resources)"[9]
No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points
So long as these people who CHOOSE to be wrong, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, more people will suffer and die; some slowly, some quickly and horrifically, like these fire fighters.


1 comment:


  1. For some it may be difficult to accept climate change, but no one can debate the fact that wildfires occur ... so why is it that John Kline would vote against fire prevention when it was cost neutral ? Despite John Kline's objections, it was overwhelmingly approved.

    But then again this should not be a surprise, as John Kline voted against funding for SuperStorm Sandy recovery ... heck, he even objected to funding for the reconstruction of I-35 bridge.

    ReplyDelete