Friday, May 20, 2011

Stop the Obstructionism - a PSA

This is Godwin Liu, this is not a blatantly unqualified candidate being promoted the way that Bush did with say, Harriet Myers.  This is not a candidate who has the baggage and the questionable qualifications of say, a Clarence Thomas.  This is a bi-partisan supported candidate of impeccable qualifications who has been the subject of a filibuster for absolutely NO other reason than partisan dickishness.  This demonstrates more clearly than ever that the GOP and the Tea Partiers have joined to continue to be the party of NO, not the party of change.  If there was ever a clear cut example of the right being willing to sacrifice the conduct of government to get their own way, in a temper tantrum tantamount to the conduct of a spoiled child, it is this.

While People for the American way can be fairly categorized as left leaning, their statements in the message below appear to be so far as I could tell, absolutely accurate, fair and objective.

Imagine senators of one party filibustering a judicial nominee who has been hailed as one of his generation’s great legal minds by legal experts of both parties and across the ideological spectrum on the grounds that he is *too* qualified.


Well that's exactly what happened today.

In what could be the most egregious example of the GOP’s partisan obstruction of judicial nominations to date, Senate Republicans today blocked Goodwin Liu from receiving an up or down vote. Liu, a law professor and dean at U.C. Berkeley who as a nominee has the American Bar Association’s highest rating, was nominated for a seat on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by President Obama over a year ago, and has since been approved by the Judiciary Committee three times.


His credentials and grasp of the law and Constitution are impeccable. Liu’s only mistake: being too qualified.

At age 40, his confirmation to the 9th Circuit could put him in position to be the first Asian American Supreme Court nominee. Because of his intellectual heft, his commitment to Americans’ constitutional rights and his commonsense understanding of how the law impacts people’s lives, the prospect of Liu’s future elevation, and even his influence on a Circuit Court of Appeals, terrifies corporate special interests and right-wing ideologues ... the same people calling the shots with Republican senators.

Shame on them. The concocted justifications Republican senators used in their opposition to Liu were based on unbelievable distortions of his record by Radical Right activist groups, as well as Liu’s testimony in opposition to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s confirmation. They rested their opposition on lies because they know that a Liu filibuster makes a mockery of the supposed agreement between parties to employ a filibuster only in “extraordinary circumstances.” Everything about Goodwin Liu’s record and the breadth of his support indicates a legal expert squarely in the mainstream -- the only thing “extraordinary” about him is how good he is, and how deserving he was of confirmation.

Every GOP senator except Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski participated in the filibuster. If one or both of your U.S. senators are Republicans, CALL them right now and let them hear it. Tell them, “shame on you for filibustering Goodwin Liu,” and let them know that you will be working hard to hold them accountable in their state.

Make sure you SIGN our “Stop the Obstruction” petition to the Senate and let senators of both parties know that the continued obstruction of the president’s nominees is hurting our country and will not be tolerated.

We need Republicans to feel the pressure about their judicial obstructions just like they are feeling it about their attacks on Medicare. And Democratic leaders in the Senate need to know that they must be using every tool in their arsenal to combat this obstruction.

Demand an end to the obstruction. And tell others to do the same.

I hope you’re as outraged as we are. And I hope you channel that outrage into activism. Thank you for all you do!

1 comment:

  1. He's too qualified.

    And supports the Civic right interpretation of the Second Amendment.

    Go figure!

    ReplyDelete