Sunday, October 7, 2012

The National Federation of Independent Business ISN'T






A little fact checking of Romney that was missed by the fact check entities.

EVERYTHING Romney is proposing is calculated to redistribute our money to the upper 1%; it is NOT even remotely about helping small business, unless you consider Donald Trump or the Koch Brothers conglomerate 'small business'.

Mittens quoted a study by the National Federation of Independent Businesses; they are a far right wing lobbying group.  They are NOT a legitimate organization of non-partisan businesses or in any way 'independent'.

They do or say whatever the right wing WANTS them to do or say.  They are as highly partisan, and special interest oriented as the United States Chamber of Commerce, which has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with LOCAL Chambers of Commerce (unless you count the U.S. group co-opting their name and identities from the local groups).

Likewise, the quoting of how the largest 3% of 'small business' hires 50% of the labor force figure that Mittens quoted in the debate ---and which has been widely quoted by other sources? That's not a real study either, that's more right wing bullshit propaganda that has ZERO actual credibility.

Unfortunately, the majority of people who take what they heard from Mittens on trust that it is what it is represented to be, won't fact check, and wont know the difference between bona fides and bogus fiddling.  The right wing has made a virtual industry out of sham groups to promote their fake facts.

I'm sick of it. People should be angry, people should be fleeing the right wing, and distrusting ANY and EVERY statistic or fact-turd they put forward. Often, the NFIB actually promotes policies that HARM the small entrepreneur operation in favor of helping what most people consider BIG business and the wealthy.

That is the essence of the uncaring, calculating, manipulative greed of the right wing.

From 'Family Values at Work':

The National Federation of Independent Business?
Driving a far-right political agenda far from the needs of small business


The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) bills itself as “The Voice of Small Business,” and carefully cultivates an image as a coalition of mom-and-pop small businesses, even including the word “Independent” in its name. However the NFIB is not independent at all. In fact, the evidence shows the lobby group has deep and longstanding ties to right-wing political movements and has been a partner in pushing a conservative ideology and agenda that is often at odds with the needs of small businesses.
Founded in 1944, NFIB began as a vigorous proponent of broad Federal action on antitrust issues and big business concentration - items which have completely disappeared from NFIB’s present agenda.1 In fact, one of NFIB’s partners is Crossroads GPS, a corporate funded 501(c)(4) connected to the American Crossroads Super PAC with close ties to right-wing operative Karl Rove.2 He is addressing NFIB’s 2012 Small Business Summit on May 14 in Washington, DC.3
The connection is worth millions to both: In 2010, Crossroads GPS gave $3.7 million to NFIB – a contribution which a December 2011 opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal described as part of a “trial run” at what Crossroads called “funding the right,” adding that Crossroads CEO Steven Law considered the initiative “money well spent.4” Donations for the second half of 2011 and 2012 are not yet public.
And in 2010, the NFIB reported paying more than $3 million for “advertising services” to Crossroads Media LLC,5 a Virginia-based firm that does media placement for American Crossroads and shares office space with a number of other Super PACs.6
But Rove is not the NFIB’s sole connection to the ideological right.
NFIB Connections to the Right
NFIB President Dan Danner
NFIB president and CEO Donald A. “Dan” Danner was never a small businessman. Instead, he started out as a lobbyist for the steel industry. Before joining NFIB, Danner served as deputy director in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the first Reagan term. That office coordinated the Reagan administration’s ties with the New Right and Christian evangelical political movements that had grown up during the late 1970s.
Dan Danner went on to become George Mason University’s executive vice president for university
advancement where he was caught up in a controversy over funneling federal grant money to right wingoperative Paul Weyrich’s Free Congress Research and Education Foundation.7
***************************************
For those of you who can't place the name of Paul Weyrich, this might help   He is considered one of the founders of the 'New Right', where the Dixiecrats and racist conservatives coalesced, post civil rights legislation.  He is a founder of the Moral Majority and the Heritage Foundation.

Still think this is a 'non-partisan' business organization? Of course not; it doesn't even pretend to be anymore -- except when the right tries to lie to the uninformed voter in acts of deliberate deception.:








There are a LOT of agendas in play dating back to  Weyrich, and the NFIB that are not only right wing, but extremist 'new right' racist politics and other special interest politicking.
That is important when you hear Romney allying himself with this group in a presidential debate.

There are a lot of devils dancing in their details.
*************************************************************************Back to the article:

As top lobbyist at NFIB, Danner attended meetings with Republican leaders at least twice a month for 12 years, according to the Washington Post,8 and was called “the go-to guy for the House Republican leadership” by a congressional staffer in 2005.9
Chief Lobbyist Susan Eckerly
Over the past two decades NFIB has become a recognized “farm team” for Republican staffers who went to work on K Street.10
NFIB’s in-house lobbying operation is headed by Senior Vice President for Public Policy Susan Eckerly, who came to NFIB in 1996 from Citizens for a Sound Economy, co-founded by oil billionaire David Koch in 1984 and since merged into the Koch-backed organizations FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity.
Before that Eckerly served in the Labor Department in the George H.W. Bush administration and had been deputy director of economic policy studies at the Heritage Foundation.11 While at Heritage, Eckerly endorsed the call to repeal the Community Reinvestment Act, the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.12 Eckerly also opposed minimum wage legislation in 1994 and again in 1999.
Communications Director Jean Card
NFIB’s National Media Office, based in Washington, DC, is headed by vice president of media and
communications Jean Card. Card is a onetime Task Force Director of the American Legislative Exchange  Council (ALEC) (September 1994–June 1996), which she left to work for NFIB for five years, a position she returned to in 201013
NFIB’s Lobbying and PAC
NFIB’s spent nearly $9.5 million on lobbying in 2010 and 2011, when it engaged in heavy activity over healthcare reform battles in Congress.14 The group recently retained Mark Warren, former chief counsel of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, as a lobbyist.15
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, NFIB’s PAC raised $20,157,250 from 1998-2012 to support candidates in state and federal elections.16 In 2010 nearly 94% of NFIB’s PAC contributions went to Republicans.17 This election cycle, the figure is closer to 98%.

NFIB Legal Foundation
The NFIB is the principal private litigant suing in the Supreme Court to overturn the Affordable Healthcare Act. President Dan Danner told The Wall Street Journal that the healthcare litigation cost NFIB $2.9 million in 2010 alone, with about $1.6 million coming from “‘contributed services,’ referring to an agreement with an outside law firm to handle the case.”18
The NFIB Small Business Legal Center’s budget has grown from $300,000 in 2000 to over $2.2 million in 2010. As a tax-exempt 501c(3), NFIB SBLC is not required to disclose the source of its funding, and has refused to disclose from where it received the additional funding for the healthcare litigation.
From 2003-2004, NFIB’s Small Business Legal Center received $88,000 in funding from the Koch-controlled Claude R. Lambe Foundation.19 NFIB SBLC also received $100,000 from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, the leading foundation funder of the right wing think tank infrastructure, in the run-up to the fall 2010 congressional elections and just as its healthcare litigation was ramping up.20
Questions are being raised about the NFIB carrying out this activity under the umbrella of a charitable non-profit organization whose supporters can take tax write-offs for their contributions to the group.
Questions have also arisen about the propriety of NFIB paying the lion’s share for litigation involving 26 states. “My concern is if it’s a lawsuit on behalf of the people of Florida, then I would believe it should be the people of Florida footing the bill,” state Rep. Mark Pafford, D-West Palm Beach, told the Palm Beach Post.

1 See Harder’s statements in Louis Stark, “Grange Head Cool to Prince Inquiry,” New York Times, August 14, 1947.
2 American Crossroads, led by its president Steven Law (who was general counsel of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce before leaving to head Crossroads), is playing a central leadership role in coordinating right wing groups as they plan to deploy money and resources for the November 2012 elections. See Kenneth P. Vogel, “Karl Rove’s Fight Club,” Politico, March 27, 2012.
3 “The 2012 Small Business Summit Is Vital,” NFIB website, accessed March 12, 2012.
4 Fred Barnes, “The GOP’s Answer to Union Money,” Wall Street Journal, December 28, 2011.
5 NFIB Inc., IRS Form 990, 2010, p. 8.
6 See chart in “66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 555,” New York Times, February 25, 2012; also Mike McIntyre and Michael Luo, “Fine Line Between ‘Super PACs’ and Campaigns,” New York Times, February 25, 2012.
7 Peter Baker, “GMU Defends Journal against ‘Pork’ Label: Conservative Group Gets Most of U.S. Grant,” Washington Post, March 6, 1993. Weyrich co-founded the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the Heritage Foundation in 1973.
8 Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, “Democrats’ Victory Is Felt On K Street,” Washington Post, November 23, 2006.
9 “Lobby League #37: Small Business,” The Hill, May 25, 2005.
10 Anna Palmer, “New Leadership at NFIB Makes a Return to Roots,” Roll Call, November 30, 2009.
11 While at the Heritage Foundation, Eckerly said “it was because of ADA [the Americans with Disabilities Act] that today we’re mobilized to fight against unfunded federal mandates.” Joyce Price, “As Disability-Law Deadlines Loom, So Do Huge Costs Jurisdictions Struggle To Fund Changes Needed To Obey ADA,” The Washington Times October 15, 1993.
12 Cindy Skrzycki, “Federal Regulations May Be In For A Bumpy Ride,” The San Francisco Chronicle, December 5, 1994.
13 “Jean Card,” NFIB Inside Out, accessed March 11, 2012.
14 Center for Responsive Politics, National Federation of Independent Business lobbying profiles for 2010 and 2011.
15 Congressional Lobbying Registration, Mark Warren, January 26, 2012.
16 Center for Responsive Politics PAC reports, National Federation of Independent Business, total of summary reports of receipts, 1998-2012.
17 Center for Responsive Politics, “National Federation of Independent Business: Contributions to Federal Candidates, 2010.” NFIB’s PAC contributed $46,000 to Democrats and $720,744 to Republicans that year.
18 Sarah E. Needleman and Angus Loten, “A Small-Business Lobby’s Million-Dollar Legal Assault,” Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2012.
19 Claude R. Lambe Foundation, IRS Form 990s for 2003 and 2004.
20 Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, IRS Form 990, 2010, pp. 73-74.

7 comments:

  1. Were you surprised to hear Mitt Romney cite the NFIB ? Were you surprised that Mitt Romney forgot to mention that the NFIB was one of the parties that filed the suit that over the Affordable Care Act that the Supreme Court rejected ?

    Why no mention of the Small Business Majority which has polls that show a majority of small businesses want the tax cuts associated with ObamaCare and approve of the healthcare program.

    Romney -- “Your plan is to take the tax rate on successful small businesses from 35 percent to 40 percent. The National Federation of Independent Business has said that will cost 700,000 jobs” (Romney is apparently referring to a report prepared by Ernst & Young on behalf of NFIB and other organizations. It says the job losses occur over an unspecified "long-term" and the analysis also takes into account other possible changes to the tax code.)However, analysts at the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation have said that Obama’s plan to use new tax revenue to pay down the deficit would “help the economy in the long run by leading to lower interest rates and higher investment — the opposite of what the NFIB study concluded.”

    700,000 is scary ... and Romney's no fool ... he knows how to scare people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, dog gone:

    You just knooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow that Cenk is saying allathat stuff because he's being paid bazillions by his BilderbergiSorossian masters!

    Note:

    Every time I try to leave a comment here I have to do the anti-robot thing--a major pain in the ass--but NOW I have to sign in to my google account, even though I'm already signed in, every time I come over here. In addition I get lots of Nigerian and Chinese loveletters every time I visit. I know that you don't do these things deliberately but it makes commenting a chore that I'm less interested in each time I do it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. DG- Very nice post. Well written as usual. I would just like to add that the Family Values at Work organization is a Left wing lobbying group which receives a good amount of money from the AFL-CIO.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, Family Values is more grassroots than lobbying; they are closer to a policy think tank.

    Do you have sources for funding from the AFL CIO?

    I am aware that they receive a lot of foundational funding that is NOT partisan, like from the Ford Foundation.

    More to the point, I fact checked the statements made in that report, and they were accurate, no fudges, no spin, straight up fact.

    THAT is not the case on the so-called report from the NOT a Federation of Independent Business.

    And THAT is the problem - lack of accuracy combined with deliberate intent to deceive and mislead.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DG- I respectfully disagree. In Illinois, FV@W lobby in the Illinois House for various worker rights. Donations by AFL-CIO, as well as BAC local 21 were in quite a few journals I receive from the IUBAC. They were for good causes that I support, such as leave, and sick days.

    As far as the fact checking, I never questioned that, or any other part of your post. Just wanted to add a little.

    On a side note, I commented on your Columbus Day post, and it didn't go through. Did you delete, is it in spam, or did it not go through?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While that may be the case in IL, the FV is a 17 state and local consortium that gets funding from a lot of sources, most of them, so far as I can tell, grants like the Ford Foundation one I mentioned.

      Yes, they do promote positive family legislation like sick days and leave; however, if it is left to appear that the AFL-CIO is not just A supporter, it appears they are in the pocket of one party.

      That does not appear to be a fair representation of this organization; it is much more diverse than that, more independent, and more broadly funded.

      Delete
    2. I would add, in a way that NFIB is NOT.

      Delete