Monday, August 27, 2012

The Massive Difference between NRA Legislation and What Lawful Gun Owners - and most Americans - Support

Who wants criminals to have guns?
Legal gun owners, including NRA members, and non-owners don't want that.
Who makes it EASY for criminals to get guns?
The NRA does, in order to increase the sales for their real clients, the gun manufacturers.  The NRA acts as both a legal gun manufacturer lobby, and an illegal/unregistered one through ALEC, where it buys those thousands of corrupt CONSERVATIVE politicians.

Who characterizes the NRA membership? Conservatives, white, out of shape, crabby old men, make up the majority of the NRA -- which is who the NRA manipulates with ludicrous fear mongering, and outright lies.

The following is to educate Joe Doakes and some of our lurking trolls who lack his courage to comment, readers who either do not recognize or who are apparently too fact averse/ ill-informed about the distinctions between what the NRA promulgates, and what lawful gun owners want.

Pollsters and political operatives don't come any further right, at least none who are respected, more than Frank Luntz.

From MAIG, press release July 24, 2012

NEW POLL OF NRA MEMBERS BY FRANK LUNTZ SHOWS STRONG SUPPORT FOR COMMON-SENSE GUN LAWS, EXPOSING SIGNIFICANT DIVIDE BETWEEN RANK-AND-FILE MEMBERS AND NRA LEADERSHIP

Gun Owners Believe Protecting Second Amendment Goes Hand-in-Hand with Keeping Guns Out of the Hands of Criminals

Overwhelming Support for Background Checks for All Buyers; Barring Terror Suspects from Firearm Ownership; and Requiring Reporting of Lost and Stolen Guns – Measures Opposed by the NRA’s Washington Office

Mayors Against Illegal Guns today released the findings of a survey by GOP pollster Frank Luntz showing that NRA members and gun owners overwhelmingly support a variety of laws designed to keep firearms out of dangerous hands, even as the Washington gun lobby prepares to spend unprecedented millions supporting candidates who pledge to oppose any changes to U.S. gun laws. The poll also dispels the myth among many Washington pundits that there is a lack of public support for common-sense measures that would help keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people and keep Americans safe.

Among the survey’s key findings:
  • 87 percent of NRA members agree that support for Second Amendment rights goes hand-in-hand with keeping guns out of the hands of criminals.
  • There is very strong support for criminal background checks among NRA members and gun owners:
  • 74 percent of NRA members and 87 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring criminal background checks of anyone purchasing a gun.
  • 79 percent of NRA members and 80 percent of non-NRA gun owners support requiring gun retailers to perform background checks on all employees – a measure recently endorsed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms industry.

NRA members strongly support allowing states – not the Federal government – to set basic eligibility requirements for people who want to carry concealed, loaded guns in public places, with 91 percent of NRA members stating states should decide.

By contrast, the NRA leadership’s top Federal legislative priority – national reciprocity for concealed carry permits – would effectively eliminate these requirements by forcing every state to allow non-residents to carry concealed guns even if they would not qualify for a local permit. NRA members support many common state eligibility rules for concealed carrying:

  • 75 percent of NRA members believe concealed carry permits should only be granted to applicants who have not committed any violent misdemeanors, including assault.

  • 74 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants who have completed gun safety training.

  • 68 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants who do not have prior arrests for domestic violence.

  • 63 percent of NRA members believe permits should only be granted to applicants 21 years of age or older.

The NRA rank and file also supports barring people on terror watch lists from buying guns (71 percent) and believe the law should require gun owners to alert police to lost and stolen guns (64 percent). The NRA’s Washington office strongly opposes both measures.

The Luntz findings are in line with previous research showing that Americans are nearly unanimous in their support for closing loopholes that allow dangerous people to buy firearms without a background check. A January 2011 poll conducted for Mayors Against Illegal Guns by the bipartisan polling team of Momentum Analysis and American Viewpoint found that 86 percent of Americans and 81 percent of gun owners support requiring all gun buyers to pass a background check, no matter where they buy a gun or who they but it from.

“Gun owners and NRA members overwhelmingly support common sense steps to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, even as the NRA leadership continues to oppose them,” said Mayors Against Illegal Guns Co-Chair and New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. “It’s time for those in Washington – and those running for President – to stand with gun owning citizens who are concerned about public safety, rather than influence peddling lobbyists who are obsessed with ideology. I join with NRA members in urging Washington to pass a law requiring universal background checks for all gun sales – and to take other common sense steps that will save lives.”

“This poll shows plain and simply how seriously out-of-step the leadership of the NRA is with its membership – and how, despite what previous polls say, there really is support for common sense gun laws in the U.S.,” said Mayors Against Illegal Guns Co-Chair and Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino. “The best way to honor the memory of those who senselessly lost their lives in Aurora is to make it harder for this to ever happen again. Our political leaders need to lead – and we demand they act now.”

The Luntz poll of 945 gun owners nationwide was conducted in May 2012 and was divided evenly by gun owners who were current or lapsed members of the NRA and non-NRA gun owners. The poll has a margin of error of + 3 percent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The poll numbers vary, depending on how the questions are asked, but consistently there is an increasing desire for MORE gun control, in response NOT ONLY to mass shootings but to all the shootings, the suicides, the murders / homicides with firearms, the muder/ suicides, the accidental shootings, and especially the deaths and injuries involving children,

Here are a few more polls from this year that illustrate that the NRA DOES NOT REPRESENT LEGAL/LAWFUL GUN OWNERS, but rather represents a narrow segment of extremist conservatives who are fact averse, and arguably hold views which are tantamount to political insanity.

The NRA is out of touch with most gun owners, and more importantly with most Americans (gun owning or non-gun owning).

Here is are the results from a CNN poll recently, that show that not even all conservatives agree with the NRA, and that 90% favor some of the legislation which could have assisted law enforcement to disarm the shooter who executed a former co-worker with five rounds on Friday BEFORE that event happened, resulting in the injuring of 9 other people.  Excerpts in bold, and enlarged are my emphasis - DG
"Not surprisingly, there are gender and ideological gaps on this issue, with more than six in ten women and two thirds of self-described liberals supporting major restrictions or a complete ban, compared to just 34% of men and 36% of self-described conservatives," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "And major restrictions on guns are most popular in urban areas and in the Northeast than in the rest of the country."

What specific restrictions do Americans favor?


The poll indicates that two meet with almost unanimous approval: Ninety-six percent are in favor of background checks and 91% support laws to prevent convicted felons or people with mental health problems from owning guns.
Three-quarters of people questioned favor gun registration with local governments, and roughly six in ten favor bans on the sale or possession of semi-automaticweapons and high-capacity ammunition clips. But 54% oppose a limit on the number of guns an individual can own, and only one in ten think that all Americans should be prevented from owning guns.


And from a CBS News poll after the Gabby Giffords mass shootings:

Even those who live in gun-owning households favor a ban on assault weapons, the poll finds, although by a smaller margin than with the rest of the population: 54 percent of those Americans favor a ban on assault weapons, and 44 percent oppose such a ban.

The survey also indicates that nearly two in three Americans favor a ban on high capacity clips that can hold dozens of rounds like the ones used in the Arizona shootings. Sixty-three percent favor a ban on such clips (including 58 percent of gun-owning households), while 34 percent oppose it.

And while there are partisan differences on many of these questions, with Democrats more supportive of tougher gun laws than Republicans, half of Republicans also favor a ban on assault weapons and on high capacity magazines.

And there was this state-wide poll in Wisconsin that shows support from gun owners AND from NRA members for the kinds of background checks on gun sales that the NRA has obstructed.  The consistent pattern has been that while there ARE Republicans who support stricter gun regulation, the more extreme right one goes, the more anti-gun control attitudes one finds. (again, emphasis added below is mine - DG)

From PR Newswire/United Business Media.:

Statewide Bipartisan Poll Commissioned by WAVE Reveals Overwhelming Support for Background Checks on All Gun Sales
Release of Poll Highlights Comes on the Heels of International Association of Chiefs of Police Groundbreaking Report Also Calling for Background

Checks on All Gun Sales

MILWAUKEE, Sept. 20 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Wisconsin Anti-Violence
Effort Executive Director, Jeri Bonavia, released the following information
and statement today in response to the new International Association of
Chiefs of Police (IACP) groundbreaking report: "Taking a Stand: Reducing
Gun Violence in Our Communities."
     See the IACP complete report here:
http://www.freedomstatesalliance.com/docs/Embargoed_IACP_Report.pdf
     The IACP report calls on local, state and federal lawmakers to enact
almost 40 recommendations to reduce gun violence and reverse the nationwide
upswing in violent crime. One of the most effective recommendations from
IACP was a requirement to conduct criminal background checks prior to all
gun sales.
     This concurs with a comprehensive, statewide bipartisan poll recently
commissioned by Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort, which found that there is
overwhelming public support for a law that would require background on all
gun sales.
     The poll was jointly conducted by a right-leaning polling firm,
Overbrook Research, and by a left-leaning firm, Lake Research Partners.
WAVE is planning a comprehensive release of the poll results in the coming
weeks.

     Some highlights of the Wisconsin statewide bipartisan poll:
     Eight out of ten likely Wisconsin voters support requiring a background
check on all gun sales;
     85% of Wisconsin residents, including 80% of gun owners, think gun
violence is a serious problem;
     Seven out of ten NRA supporters or members support background checks on
all gun sales.
     "This groundbreaking report from our nation's police chiefs highlights
the need to address gun violence with sensible and effective policies,"
said Jeri Bonavia. "Specifically, the chiefs of police and the people of
Wisconsin agree that conducting background checks on all gun sales is an
effective way to reduce gun violence and make our communities safer."

(Note, I tried to activate a link to the site indicated in this report, but couldn't find one that was current.)

And then there was this from the HuffPo regarding another bi-partisan poll taken a year ago April, emphasis added is again mine:

WASHINGTON -- Despite powerful lobbying against any new gun-control measures by groups like the National Rifle Association, a new bipartisan poll shows that both gun owners and the general public support stronger measures to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and other potentially dangerous individuals.
The poll -- conducted for the coalition Mayors Against Illegal Guns, co-chaired by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino -- suggests that while far-reaching gun-control legislation seems unlikely to pass, some narrower measures may be able to earn bipartisan support.
"Large majorities of Americans agree with the 2008 Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to own guns, and Americans strongly oppose efforts to ban handguns," said Bob Carpenter, vice president of American Viewpoint, the Republican polling firm that joined with Democratic firm Momentum Analysis to conduct the survey. "But Americans and gun owners feel with equal fervor that government must act to get every single record in the background-check system that belongs there and to ensure that every gun sale includes a background check. Most Americans view these goals, protecting gun rights for the law-abiding and keeping guns from criminals, as compatible."
Some findings from the poll results, provided exclusively to The Huffington Post:
-- 90 percent of Americans and 90 percent of gun owners support fixing gaps in government databases that are meant to prevent the mentally ill, drug abusers and others from buying guns.-- 91 percent of Americans and 93 percent of gun owners support requiring federal agencies to share information about suspected dangerous persons or terrorists to prevent them from buying guns.
-- 89 percent of Americans and 89 percent of gun owners support full funding of the law a unanimous Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed after the Virginia Tech shootings to put more records in the background-check database.
-- 86 percent of Americans and 81 percent of gun owners support requiring all gun buyers to pass a background check, no matter where they buy the gun and no matter who they buy it from.
-- 89 percent of Americans and 85 percent of gun owners support a law to require background checks for all guns sold at gun shows.

In terms of protecting Second Amendment rights, 79 percent of Americans and 90 percent of gun owners said they believe an individual has the right to own guns, and the amendment is not limited to protecting the rights of state militias. Eighty percent of Americans and 90 percent of gun owners oppose a law that would ban the sale of all handguns.
The survey also asked whether respondents believe that "the sale of guns should be more strict." Fifty-one percent said they agreed with that statement, 7 percent more than agreed in a November Gallup poll using nearly identical wording and 4 percent more than what CBS found using similar wording last week.
Jared Lee Loughner, the alleged shooter in the tragic Jan. 8 shooting in Arizona, legally obtained the Glock-19 pistol that he eventually used to kill six people and wound 13 others. Despite his documented history of drug abuse, Loughner was able to slip through the cracks and become a gun owner.
In the months following the April 2007 Virginia Tech shooting, lawmakers passed a bill meant to increase the number of records entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. But three years later, hundreds of thousands of records are still missing, allowing many to pass background checks they might otherwise fail. Additionally, since 2007, Congress allocated only $20 million of the $375 million authorized in the law.
"Our coalition of mayors has fought for years to fix our federal background check system and close loopholes that give dangerous people a way to get around the requirement altogether," Bloomberg said in a statement on the poll's findings. "This poll shows that, particularly in the wake of yet another tragic mass shooting, Americans and gun owners agree with our efforts. If the tragedy in Tucson was not enough to ensure that Congress finally takes action, we hope this clear call for reform from the public will add to the groundswell of support."
Closing the so-called "terror gap" has particularly strong support. A 2010 Government Accountability Office report found that during the past six years, individuals on the terror watchlist were able to buy firearms or explosives from licensed U.S. dealers 1,119 times.
The NRA has opposed bipartisan legislation closing the gap on the grounds that the list is flawed -- some individuals are put on the list by mistake, while many who pose legitimate threats are never added.
But this position puts the NRA far to the right of even its members. A survey last year by conservative pollster Frank Luntz found that 82 percent of NRA members supported "prohibiting people on the terrorist watch lists from purchasing guns." Eighty-six percent agreed with the statement that the country can "do more to stop criminals from getting guns while also protecting the rights of citizens to freely own them."

The NRA has taken a low profile since the Tucson shooting, telling The Daily Beast that the organization "strongly believes that now is not the time for political debates or policy discussions. Indeed, anything other than prayers for the victims and their families at this time would be inappropriate."
Currently, there is no Senate-approved head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. In 2006, the gun industry convinced Congress to require nominees for the position to meet with Senate approval. The upper chamber has not approved a single director since.
Republican senators even held up President Bush's nominee, arguing he had been "overzealous in enforcing requirements that dealers keep detailed gun-sale records." Obama's nominee, Andrew Traver, is likewise currently on hold.
A handful of lawmakers have signaled their intentions to introduce gun legislation. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) plans to introduce legislation Tuesday to "prohibit the transfer, importation, or possession of high capacity magazines manufactured after the bill is enacted." Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) is readying similar legislation in the Senate.
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) has also proposed legislation, backed by Bloomberg, making it illegal to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a government official. The latest Mayors Against Illegal Guns poll found that 58 percent of the public and 49 percent of gun owners support banning the sale of high-capacity ammunition magazines. Sixty-seven percent of the public supports the King proposal, according to that polling, along with 60 percent of gun owners.
Even McCarthy, however, admits that significant gun-control measures are unlikely to go anywhere in Congress. "Everybody is petrified of the NRA," McCarthy told The Huffington Post.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) told NBC's "Meet the Press" recently that Congress will therefore most likely look to fill the obvious gaps in current laws that have broad bipartisan support, such as pushing for better information-sharing and tightening weapon-purchasing restrictions on those diagnosed as mentally ill or drug abusers.
As HuffPost Pollster's Mark Blumenthal has noted, "While public opinion has generally turned against stricter gun-control measures over the last twenty years, majorities continue to support greater restrictions on the sort of semi-automatic weapon used in the Tucson shootings."
It seems, however, that the public's favorable views of gun rights have held despite the Tucson shooting. Forty-six percent of poll respondents said that the Jan. 8 tragedy had not changed their views on gun control at all, while only 41 percent said they now feel more strongly that gun laws should be stricter. In a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, 69 percent of those surveyed said their views on gun laws hadn't changed.
UPDATE: A HuffPost reader points out that Mayors Against Illegal Guns included both gun owners and people living in gun households as "gun owners" in the summary of its survey results. One of the pollsters who conducted the survey said that they believe "those living with the actual person on a gun license have far more in common with them than with those with no guns in the house at all."

6 comments:

  1. Thanks so much for the information. It's enlightening if true. I question that.

    The implication of the poll is that NRA leadership has Gone Rogue, that 3 million members are desperate to give up their firearms if only the wicked leadership would let them. I've never felt that from any NRA members I know, which isn't statistically significant but makes me question the poll itself.

    One interesting item was the sample weighting. Half the people asked do NOT belong to the oranization they're evaluating.

    That's like asking me "Do you agree with the leadership of Planned Parenthood?" Well, NO, which is why I don't belong to that outfit. That doesn't mean the PP leadership isn't doing exactly what its actual members want it to do.

    If you leave out the opinions of people who are NOT members, the approval percentages would skyrocket.

    This tactic is commonly found in the Minnesota POll which routinely oversamples Democrats to suppress Conservative voting in the run-up to the election by making it look as if the Democrat has an insurmountable lead, when in truth the election may be decided by 1/10 of 1% of the total vote.

    The fact this poll is commissioned by a gun-control group is a hint the methodology is suspect. The fact its results are so at variance with common experience confirms it.

    You've been fooled.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joe wrote:Thanks so much for the information. It's enlightening if true. I question that.

    The implication of the poll is that NRA leadership has Gone Rogue, that 3 million members are desperate to give up their firearms if only the wicked leadership would let them. I've never felt that from any NRA members I know, which isn't statistically significant but makes me question the poll itself.


    No, Joe, that is not what the polls says. As I remind Mitch from time to time, I don't engage in single sourcing, I multi-source. That means in this case I used multiple polls from a variety of sources, specifically bi-partisan sources, spanning a period of roughly two years, which support my contention that the NRA supports legislation contrary to both the majority of their members AND the majority of gun owners.

    Before you assert I'm wrong, do your own homework. There isn't ONLY one poll cited. Do you really believe that someone with Frank Luntz's extraordinary conservative credentials would use a suspect methodology for this???????? HE was the person who designed this poll, not the MAIG. Maybe you should refresh your knowledge about the bona fides of Frank Luntz.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz

    Joe Doakes writes:
    The fact its results are so at variance with common experience confirms it.

    It is clearly NOT at variance from common experience. It is at variance ONLY with NRA propaganda.

    I suggest you better acquaint yourself with the membership and voting practices of the NRA better than your current understanding; once again, I suspect I can educate you on a laundry list of things you DON'T know about the NRA, beginning with ALEC, and working my way through following the money trail to show who they do - and don't - represent.

    The ONLY thing this is 'at variance with' is the NRA propaganda that it represents anyone except a minority of the most radical and extreme gun owners. It hasn't done that since 1977. You appear to have bought into the propganda not the reality.

    If you have some facts to counter this, other than your impressions and anecdotal evidence, please post them here. There is a lot more sources and data which support what I've asserted here available.

    But I am confident that I do a much better job than you do Joe, of informing myself based on fact, not impression, before venturing an opinion. I can provide sources.

    I'm waiting for your sources which FACTUALLY contradict me. Good luck with that.

    I have two things going for me Joe; I read very fast with high retention and comprehension, and I was brought up to strengthen and exercise the habit of concentration as if it were a muscle you could bulk up with weight lifting exercises. I routinely plow through research that most people quit on early in, because they don't have that tolerance for applying concentration to boring content. It is part of our weakness in an instant gratification world that is accustomed to pre-digested little soundbytes of information, lacking the discipline to go for raw information in long form.

    I continue to be amazed at the advantage that provides me in research compared to a lot of people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for the discussion.

    I am a gun owner who supports a ban on large-capacity ammo feeds. I can think of only one purpose for these devices: killing a lot of people quickly.

    The military has no shortage of soldiers who are equipped and willing to do that job. We are not in a domestic war requiring civilian activation. Thus the only people getting killed by these weapons are civilian countrymen.

    The only domestic threat requiring a civilian to arm themselves in military-style are the other civilians who have armed themselves military-style. We have our very own cold-war hardware buildup going on right here. Fear begets fear until it eventually begets violence due to someone's manic-break.

    EgD

    ReplyDelete
  4. Welcome to Penigma, and thank you for your comment miroku20. You are absolutely correct about the internal arms race, civilian style - especially the carefully, calculated ginning up of fear.

    The reality is that we are very stable in this country, even with the occasional extremist paramilitary wackos accumulating their arsenals of weapons and ammo. Actual crime is declining, and has been for a long time.

    The idea that a bunch of hunters, for example, are going to successfully use their sporting weapons, or even their assault style toys to oppose drones and tanks and air force action with missles is ludicrous

    I don't get the reference EgD. Could you elaborate, please?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shouldn't the middle initial be capitalized?

    I thought it was some abbreviation that I had failed to recognize, like QED,......LOL.

    ReplyDelete